What does the right to bear arms mean? "By Ben Swan", page

www.fox19.com..."he-second-amendment
www.fox19.com...
Lets see what the people who swore by Ben Swan about Ron Paul.Think about his 2nd admendment stance.I for one believe he hits the nail on the head.It has nothing to do with crime rates.It is about your rights as a sovereign citizen not bound by the actions of others. Watch both videos.

We don't need less guns we need more journalists like Ben Swann.

reply to post by TheLieWeLive

---

Hard to argue with the man.

"Just the facts ma am"

There is something to be said about living in the past. You don't need to abolish anything, just reevaluate it for modern times. This seems rational and logical to me. However both sides of the discussion have made the the issue so polarized.

Originally posted by MDDoxs

YouTube Link

There is something to be said about living in the past. You don't need to abolish anything, just reevaluate it for modern times. This seems rational and logical to me. However both sides of the discussion have made the the issue so polarized.

Why stop reevaulating at the second admendment?There is lot's of crime maybe we should remove 5th admendment also and suspend Habeas corpus,if we do that.We might as well get rid of the 1st admendment.Oh hell that whole thing was written 200 years ago let's just throw the whole thing out.Those old guys had no idea what they were talking about.Except that this is what our country and freedoms were founded on!

reply to post by MrBigDave

---

You know with the opinion given so straight foward from Mr. Swan.Where are all the counter opinions on this thread?

Could it be with the way Mr. Swan presented his opinion (facts) it is kind of hard to argure with?

reply to post by rockymcgilicutty

---

Its hard to argue sound logic and truth. When your dealing with ignorant people, you kind of have to educate them without them feeling schooled. People feel schooled they get on a defensive and start to argue.

reply to post by MrBigDave

---

Agree, that is why in the face of sound logic.
People will ignore the logic.To wait for ideas that fit their opinions.

reply to post by Carreau

---

Not one responce from anti-gun crowd.So you sir are correct with the first prediction.

S&F who needs them.It is better to give a point that won't be contested.

Discussed recently here
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
and likely elsewhere.

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion in the above linked thread.
Thanks



**Thread Closed**


for future reference:

We Have A New Search Engine--Please Use It!

Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags

World\'s richest woman calls for Australian workers to be paid $2 a day to compete with Africans
  Posted 6 days ago with 69 member flags

Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags

19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags

DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags

Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags

50,000 people have 90 mins evacuate , Percy Quinn Dam expected to break
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags

The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: