FBI Documents Reveal Occupy Crackdowns WERE Coordinated, Assassinations Considered

FBI documents just released under the FOIA by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund reveal that the FBI treated the Occupy movement as a potential terrorist organization, even though the organizers had explicitly called for all protests to be peaceful, and never condoned the use of violence in any Occupy protests. The documents are heavily redacted but what can be ascertained from reading them is scary, indeed.


As early as August 2011, the FBI had its agents and offices in “high gear” as they conducted surveillance against the OWS movement in New York and across the country even before encampments were erected. Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF), released this statement:

“This production, which we believe is just the tip of the iceberg, is a window into the nationwide scope of the FBI’s surveillance, monitoring, and reporting on peaceful protestors organizing with the Occupy movement. These documents show that the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are treating protests against the corporate and banking structure of America as potential criminal and terrorist activity. These documents also show these federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America.”

Though the documents are heavily redacted, the PCJF has discovered that on August 19, 2011, the FBI met with representatives from the N.Y. Stock Exchange to discuss the upcoming protest. By September, the FBI had informed businesses on Wall Street that they might be the subject of the protest.

But the most frightening piece of information reveals that someone – exactly who is redacted – was planning to engage in sniper attacks against the leaders of OWS in several Texas cities including Houston, Austin and Dallas. The memo in question states:

“‘________’ intended to ‘gather intelligence against the leaders of the movement, obtain photographs, then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles.’”

The implications are chilling.

www.addictinginfo.org...

So here you have it, the government was planning to MURDER OWS leaders to protect their corporate overlords ability to rob the country of the future without anyone knowing. Any publicity is bad publicity when you're looting the Earth.

Actual FBI documents downloadable here; www.justiceonline.org...

Proposed assassinations of US citizens inside the US were being seriously considered? I don't even have words for how I feel, and what the implications for this are.....


And there are people out there right now that think disarming the public is a good idea because our government would never turn on us? This right here in black and white is proof that disarming the public is a bad idea. You are just scum that they scrape from their boot heel and have no regard for your existence. The fact that they even considered it, is as good as going through with it in my book.

Are we really shocked? We all knew what the government would do if OWS really started to bear fruit.

It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

This is extactly the reason we need to stay armed, and keep our eyes peeled. If they are willing to murder peaceful protestors, this means they are willing to even murder children, (hint,hint) for their agenda. Now, not saying I agree with that J. T. Ready guy with being Neo nazi, and racist or whatever, but, he had a valid point I think in showing up to that occupy protest armed along with his troops. This doesn't surprise me in the least that the feds were doing this. I was pretty sure that they had plans like this in the works anyways. We the people need to stay vigilant.

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Please explain to me why you "THINK" it would never happen,
No offense, but that statement sounds a little naive.

NDAA paves the way for this all that is needed is ows to be named a terrorist organization. Dollars to doughnuts if they restart ows again they will be made a terrorist organization through false flag or through propaganda it will happen

Originally posted by gunshooter

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Please explain to me why you "THINK" it would never happen,

No offense, but that statement sounds a little naive.

Who is going to stand in front of a mic on live television to explain to the country that killing a college kid who spoke his/her views with suppressed sniper fire, was in the American peoples best interest?

Bush opened the gate on these investigations and they are going to keep going on till there is no more threat of world Terror. Since it is obvious that the war on terror is s sham i imagine that there are going to be a lot of bored investigators out there looking for anything that fall in their job description. The go-ahead still needs to be given from many levels of "higher ups" before it is executed.

The FBI and HLS do not have a steady green light to hit any potential threat.

Originally posted by SpaDe_


And there are people out there right now that think disarming the public is a good idea because our government would never turn on us? This right here in black and white is proof that disarming the public is a bad idea. You are just scum that they scrape from their boot heel and have no regard for your existence. The fact that they even considered it, is as good as going through with it in my book.

your government and law enforcement have turned on your countrymen long long time ago .

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Comparing war game scenarios to planned possible assassination of US citizens inside the US isn't even in the same play book let alone in the same section of the library. You are way off the reservation here if you think that they would not have carried this out if someone gave them the green light. I am sure it would have been pinned on some poor anti OWS patsy too.

I hope this wakes some individuals up that have had their heads in the sand to the fact that the government is not here to protect them. But more than likely this will be ignored just like other warnings have been and they will continue to just turn to Facebook, American Idol, and all the other distractions that are out there.

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Comparing war game scenarios to planned possible assassination of US citizens inside the US isn't even in the same play book let alone in the same section of the library. You are way off the reservation here if you think that they would not have carried this out if someone gave them the green light. I am sure it would have been pinned on some poor anti OWS patsy too.

I hope this wakes some individuals up that have had their heads in the sand to the fact that the government is not here to protect them. But more than likely this will be ignored just like other warnings have been and they will continue to just turn to Facebook, American Idol, and all the other distractions that are out there.

I addressed everything you pointed out in my last post. There were no serious domestic terror threats back then and now it IS in the same play book.

Nobody is waking anything. Settle down. NOBODY IS GOING GIVE A DAMN. The only that would have woke up anyone is a college kid getting shot dead at a peaceful protest.

reply to post by FirstCasualty


It's already has happened before. Kent State...... If you think it wouldn't happen again, you're beyond gullible.

The Kent State shootings—also known as the May 4 massacre or the Kent State massacre[2][3][4]—occurred at Kent State University in the U.S. city of Kent, Ohio, and involved the shooting of unarmed college students by the Ohio National Guard on Monday, May 4, 1970. The guardsmen fired 67 rounds over a period of 13 seconds, killing four students and wounding nine others, one of whom suffered permanent paralysis.[5]

According to the Plain Dealer description of the enhanced recording, a male voice yells "Guard!" Several seconds pass. Then, "All right, prepare to fire!" "Get down!," someone shouts urgently, presumably in the crowd. Finally, "Guard! . . . " followed two seconds later by a long, booming volley of gunshots. The entire spoken sequence lasts 17 seconds. Further analysis of the audiotape revealed that four pistol shots and a violent confrontation occurred approximately 70 seconds before the National Guard opened fire. According to The Plain Dealer, this new analysis raised questions about the role of Terry Norman, a Kent State student who was an FBI informant and known to be carrying a pistol during the disturbance.

en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by FirstCasualty

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Comparing war game scenarios to planned possible assassination of US citizens inside the US isn't even in the same play book let alone in the same section of the library. You are way off the reservation here if you think that they would not have carried this out if someone gave them the green light. I am sure it would have been pinned on some poor anti OWS patsy too.

I hope this wakes some individuals up that have had their heads in the sand to the fact that the government is not here to protect them. But more than likely this will be ignored just like other warnings have been and they will continue to just turn to Facebook, American Idol, and all the other distractions that are out there.

I addressed everything you pointed out in my last post. There were no serious domestic terror threats back then and now it IS in the same play book.

Nobody is waking anything. Settle down. NOBODY IS GOING GIVE A DAMN. The only that would have woke up anyone is a college kid getting shot dead at a peaceful protest.

Tell me where and when OWS was labelled a terrorist organization, and who specifically inside OWS is a known terrorist?

Originally posted by gunshooter
This is extactly the reason we need to stay armed, and keep our eyes peeled. If they are willing to murder peaceful protestors, this means they are willing to even murder children, (hint,hint) for their agenda. Now, not saying I agree with that J. T. Ready guy with being Neo nazi, and racist or whatever, but, he had a valid point I think in showing up to that occupy protest armed along with his troops. This doesn't surprise me in the least that the feds were doing this. I was pretty sure that they had plans like this in the works anyways. We the people need to stay vigilant.

This is an excellent point. And the part regarding "children," is relevant and on-point as well. I found it rather odd that many people speculating about the recent shooting being a false flag were talking about "actors" etc, when I'm reasonably confident that certain segments of our government would have no problem actually causing a tragic event where 20+ people lose their lives. No actors required. Unless by "actors" you mean someone who commits an "act," and by "act" you mean "homicide."

Governments kill. This is a fact. Normally we "like to" think that our governments only coordinate their efforts to kill people in other countries. However, it makes more sense when you think of it in terms of furtherance of a larger, long-term goal. That is why people in other countries are killed-- furtherance of a particular large and/or long-term goal. Well, if killing 10-20 people would help further some larger goal, and those people just happened to have been born here, and not in another country... what is the difference? (To them, that is?)

I'm sure there are plenty of other people in our government who would find this idea repulsive. That thought helps me sleep at night. lol But I fear their opponents do exist among them / us.

Hey I have an idea...Let's give up our guns.

Its not like the government would consider murdering all of us...Oh wait...

Now I have all the proof I need for people who believe that government getting so far out of control that they would assassinate Americans protesting is a stupid reason to own guns...because it could never happen here right?

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by FirstCasualty

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by FirstCasualty
It never would have happened.


US agencies have plans drawn up to kill everybody, its just part of the game. Didn't the US have plans written up to invade Canada?

Comparing war game scenarios to planned possible assassination of US citizens inside the US isn't even in the same play book let alone in the same section of the library. You are way off the reservation here if you think that they would not have carried this out if someone gave them the green light. I am sure it would have been pinned on some poor anti OWS patsy too.

I hope this wakes some individuals up that have had their heads in the sand to the fact that the government is not here to protect them. But more than likely this will be ignored just like other warnings have been and they will continue to just turn to Facebook, American Idol, and all the other distractions that are out there.

I addressed everything you pointed out in my last post. There were no serious domestic terror threats back then and now it IS in the same play book.

Nobody is waking anything. Settle down. NOBODY IS GOING GIVE A DAMN. The only that would have woke up anyone is a college kid getting shot dead at a peaceful protest.

Tell me where and when OWS was labelled a terrorist organization, and who specifically inside OWS is a known terrorist?

when they openly denounced capitalism and democracy. They might as well be on the Taliban's payroll.

I actually really don't understand your question. You are saying the FBI is targeting OWS protesters, and then your asking who thinks OWS is a terrorist organization. I guess the answer to that would be the FBI and HLS. ask them why they were targeted. I'm assuming it was classified as domestic terrorism.

I have a feeling that if we were able to read it all in unredacted form, that the FBI would indeed be worried about being stormed by angry mobs and torn limb from limb from city to city.. Sounds like they actually deserve it.

Originally posted by projectvxn
Hey I have an idea...Let's give up our guns.

Its not like the government would consider murdering all of us...Oh wait...

For What... What are we going to Wait For...
You Had your Guns when they Killed Kennedy, and What did you do?
You had your Guns when they Lied about and Invaded Iraq , and What did you do?
You had your Guns when they said they could Detain and Arrest Americans with no Due Process, and What did you do?

NOTHING , Your Guns are going to do Nothing , because you and your Gun Croonies are going to do Nothing.

So Stop with the Tyrannical Gov B,S,

reply to post by FirstCasualty

Who is going to stand in front of a mic on live television to explain to the country that killing a college kid who spoke his/her views with suppressed sniper fire, was in the American peoples best interest?

plans are made with the intention of being used, or being useful. ever heard of "premeditated murder"?

the person answering questions would probably be the FBI, and they would have blamed it on right-wing extremists and then used it as another reason to ban guns.

i'm sorry, but you don't fool anyone.

when they openly denounced capitalism and democracy. They might as well be on the Taliban's payroll.

lol, not very subtle either. the bank bailout is about as far away from capitalism as you can get, and i'm not sure how they were denouncing democracy. our nation isn't even a democracy. the protests were about the people's will being ignored, and the poor business practices of the banks being fixed with money from the common citizen, who is actually required to pay his or her own debt.

reply to post by FirstCasualty

when they openly denounced capitalism and democracy. They might as well be on the Taliban's payroll.

When did they denounce democracy? OWS was all about power to the people.

And just exactly how are socialists anything close to the Taliban? I'm a socialist and socialist ideals are directly opposite to the Taliban. You're very uneducated and probably some sort of shill.



Guess I'm a terrorist too