You seem like a very informed person on this subject.
I'm interested in your thoughts on the "cover up" of advanced technology that could potentially solve certain world crises, such as our reliance on fossil fuels even though we should have recovered enough tech to be rid of that, Tesla's free energy grids (along with the "power towers" or obelisks of ancient civilizations, I believe the 2 are tied together but I won't assume that connection), among others.
Does all of that fall back on human greed/capitalism? Or is it also to prevent mass hysteria/panic? Or is there some other reason I have yet to think of?
Also, do you know/believe the theory of certain figures in Hollywood being fed information by our government on this subject to slowly introduce the public to the existence of E.T.? (Steven Spielberg mainly, but I'm sure there are others as well)
I do understand the necessity to keep the existence of E.T. under wraps to prevent mass hysteria/panic, as I definitely agree most of the public is not ready for this type of exposure and would react in the way we assume they would. I just can't understand why we would not use the technology we have found to help humanity, if that application is possible.
edit on 5-1-2013 by McGooferson because: grammar