It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by akushla99
The notion that we are to become 'enlightened' in one lifetime, and one lifetime alone, is absurd beyond belief...
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by akushla99
The notion that we are to become 'enlightened' in one lifetime, and one lifetime alone, is absurd beyond belief...
Not really. The only lesson to be learned is to love God and love your neighbour as yourself. Once one stops putting themselves before others, that's pretty much in hand -- no multiple, disconnected lives needed.
Which doesn't help you when you're here.
The Gnostic view of reincarnation isn't the same as yours.
It's worse, because it collapsed about 200 years after it started,
but they didn't view reincarnation as "progressing."
Wisdom of Solomon is a Jewish text, and many Jews believe in the pre-existence of the soul. I don't know that that notion is incompatible with Christianity, but it's not the same thing as reincarnation -- the Mormons believe in the pre-existence of the soul, but do not believe in reincarnation.
From personal experience, no. Mine is not the life I, or anyone, would have chosen.
Originally posted by windword
I have many examples of personal growth through the remembering of something that occurred in a past life, as it relates to a present time situation, but I won't subject you to my "fantasies."
I did give it a chance -- I studied Hinduism for a while in my 20s, but in the end, none of it made any sense when I actually tried to work through the practicalities.
No offense meant, but Buddha was to Hinduism as Jesus was to Judaism. Buddha taught "The Way" to free oneself from the "Karmic Wheel" that Hinduism teaches. But the lessons from the Bagavagita are still beautiful.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by adjensen
Which doesn't help you when you're here.
While you're "home" you have the chance to reflect on what has occurred... and those memories influence how you will react to certain situations in the next incarnation. Even if you don't know they exist
It's worse, because it collapsed about 200 years after it started,
Collapsed or was destroyed? Just because a belief is destroyed doesn't make it less valid...
but they didn't view reincarnation as "progressing."
you're wrong...
They viewed reincarnation as a learning process...
My mistake... I could have sworn I read that the catholic church accepted this book as canon...
From personal experience, no. Mine is not the life I, or anyone, would have chosen.
I didn't say you chose your existence.... your life is what you've made it...
Do you believe starving children choose their existence?
Just to be clear -- there is no doubt in my mind that you believe those experiences to be real. I just don't believe that they are.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Then they mock and admonish people who have spiritual experiences from other avenues, saying they have been deceived by Satan.
Originally posted by DoubleEE
reply to post by jiggerj
thanks for making me feel better. i would love it if you visited my intro post.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
it might help you understand some things about me.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Reincarnation no. Now genetic memory, passing memories down through genes yes.
"Why would Satan bother coming up with a big lie about reincarnation? What's the point?"
Mankind has an innate desire to commune with God. It is in our nature, because God put it there. Satan will use any means available to lead people away from God. He doesn't have to get people to believe there is no god, he simply has to get them to not believe in the Christian God. A simple way for him to do this is with counterfeit religious experiences such as "reincarnation past-lives."
"Is there any evidence that reincarnation is true?"
There IS false evidence that reincarnation is true.
Huh? False evidence of truth? What does that mean?
Suppose you are on a jury trying Smith for burglary, and Smith did commit the burglary. Smith gets on the witness stand and lies—he says he was with his girlfriend all day. Smith has presented evidence. It is false evidence, but it still is evidence.
But what if you believe Smith? You think you reached the correct decision, but it's still false evidence. You leave secure in the knowledge that Smith didn't and could not possibly have committed the burglary—after all, you have evidence. But your decision is based on false evidence.
Reincarnation -- Satan's Second-Biggest Lie
Again, that makes zero sense. You're claiming that knowledge that you're not aware of somehow influences your actions -- of what benefit is that? How are you supposed to "progress" if your behaviour is modified by these unknown insights?
How are you supposed to "progress" if your behaviour is modified by these unknown insights? What's the point of "life" if you're just a puppet of yourself in some other sense?
It does for that group, because the Gnosis had to come from a Gnostic master,
and once they died out (no, the church wasn't at a point where it could "destroy" them, but pressure from the church most certainly led to their decline in popularity) the knowledge that they held died with them, because it couldn't be written down.
That doesn't mean that Catholics wrote it.
Do you believe that starving children "made their life"?
As I said, no, my life is not one I would have chosen, any more than a starving child would choose that life.
But there are those who believe in reincarnation that also believe that people "script" their lives, in order to learn some lesson or another.
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Reincarnation has a HUGE stealth purpose...
Just like ALL other religious propaganda.
Reincarnation is just ONE small piece of the agenda behind false religion.
The real purpose behind that agenda is just another ploy to mislead people away from the truth
The people of the world believe this lie because a vast new age bombardment of misinformation.
Satan will use ANY means available to lead people away from God.
A simple way for him to do this is with counterfeit religious experiences such as 'reincarnation past-lives.
"Why would Satan bother coming up with a big lie about reincarnation? What's the point?"
Mankind has an innate desire to commune with God. It is in our nature, because God put it there. Satan will use any means available to lead people away from God. He doesn't have to get people to believe there is no god, he simply has to get them to not believe in the Christian God. A simple way for him to do this is with counterfeit religious experiences such as "reincarnation past-lives."
"Is there any evidence that reincarnation is true?"
There IS false evidence that reincarnation is true.
Huh? False evidence of truth? What does that mean?
Suppose you are on a jury trying Smith for burglary, and Smith did commit the burglary. Smith gets on the witness stand and lies—he says he was with his girlfriend all day. Smith has presented evidence. It is false evidence, but it still is evidence.
But what if you believe Smith? You think you reached the correct decision, but it's still false evidence. You leave secure in the knowledge that Smith didn't and could not possibly have committed the burglary—after all, you have evidence. But your decision is based on false evidence.
Reincarnation -- Satan's Second-Biggest Lie
Originally posted by Klassified
Well, if we're going to talk about reincarnation, the collective unconscious is something I must bring to the discussion. If you'll open your dossiers to page 1...
Collective unconscious is a term of analytical psychology, coined by Carl Jung. It is proposed to be a part of the unconscious mind, expressed in humanity and all life forms with nervous systems, and describes how the structure of the psyche autonomously organizes experience. Jung distinguished the collective unconscious from the personal unconscious, in that the personal unconscious is a personal reservoir of experience unique to each individual, while the collective unconscious collects and organizes those personal experiences in a similar way with each member of a particular species.
On page two you'll find your first conundrum. Are those who profess to remember past lives, actually remembering past lives? Or are they experiencing someone else's memories? If Jung was right, then depending on our sensitivity at any given time, what is "remembered" during hypnotic regression, or dreams, may not be our own experiences, but someone else's.
On the other hand. There are those who claim(Delores Cannon comes to mind) that past life regression can be an effective tool in solving present life problems because of "excess baggage" that has been carried over into this life.
So the question is, can we distinguish between Collective memories, and soul incarnations? Or, are either mutually exclusive?
Hamlet:
And therefore as a stranger give it welcome. There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
reply to post by akushla99
Its his path to take, man, his path.
I agree with you but I have learned that judgment is not my place, and honestly since we create the reality we make his belief becomes as real as say, yours or mine.
But I would say Truth is we are Eternal and One with Source, and that there is no "deception" other than the ones we place between us and the One.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Then they mock and admonish people who have spiritual experiences from other avenues, saying they have been deceived by Satan.
I've never used Satan as my "go-to guy" -- to the best of my knowledge, I've never told anyone anything that they've experienced has been a deceit by him. Apart from factual errors or misrepresentations of belief systems that I know a thing or two about, I don't generally fault anyone for their spiritual claims. If a person wants to believe that Allah is the way to go, that they've experienced past lives, or that there's no such thing as God, that's all fine by me.
There are many instances of this type of karma in the Cayce files. One example, a college professor who had been born totally blind, heard about Cayce on a radio program called "Miracles of the Mind." He applied for a physical reading and experienced conspicuous improvements in health and vision by following its instructions, which included osteopathic adjustments, electrical treatments, and a change of diet. Within three months he had achieved 10 percent vision in his left eye, which had been considered hopeless by eye specialists. The professor's life reading outlined four previous incarnations: one in America during the Civil War period, one in France during the Crusades, one in Persia about 1000 B.C., and one in Atlantis, just before its final submergence.
It was in Persia that he had set in motion the spiritual law which resulted in his blindness in the present. He had been a member of a barbaric tribe whose custom was to blind its enemies with red-hot irons, and it had been his office to do the blinding. Cerminara, Dr. Gina (October 5, 1988), Some Types of Physical Karma. Many Mansions. 4, pgs. 48-49, New York, NY: 1988.