It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by beezzer
You know what blows me away? Going back to the quote I posted first, taken from a Non-Political legal reporting service on court filings and cases, they ARE compromising as it is.
As the filing indicates, they're willing to allow all manner of contraceptives ... and that's a BIG deal to compromise, whatever the anti-religion crowds consider it. They just won't budge on one main thing. The Morning After or Abortion Pill...and that IS precisely how Christian Faith sees that little pill.
Typical Government compromise offered in return tho. You do everything ..EVERYTHING we say and we'll compromise by not fining you into ruin. Yeah.... Sounds about right for the times. Even the courts aren't helpful anymore. (TEMPORARY injunction..that would have just ruined everything or what? Sheesh)
The "morning after" pill DOES NOT prevent implantation, it simply DELAYS ovulation.
Originally posted by Mad Simian
*snip*
It can NOT say that one group is exempt and another is not. It MUST take the position that, barring the violation of basic civil rights, it must take no position and leave the decision to do or not do so in the hands of the individual citizen. AND, that is EXACTLY the position it has taken in this case. It is NOT forcing any particular person to make the decision but is simply allowing the right to the choice.
*snip*
Originally posted by aero56
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
This is NO surprise to many of us, who have known, since before he was elected the first time, how anti-Christian this person is.
He claims he is a Christian, but he also has shown this to be a lie, in many ways:
1. He vowed to "stand with the Muslims" if things went bad
2. He attended a Muslim school as a child, and was stated to be (by a teacher) an excellent student of Islam.
3. He wears a ring stating that "there is no god but allah".
4. He mocks Christians and the Bible.
5. He holds positions on issues that are not Biblical, such as supporting abortion and homosexuality.
6. He refuses to reference God when it comes to Christian holidays, such as Thanksgiving and Christmas.
7. He spent over twenty years in a church that preached hate.
8. He has stated that the Muslim call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on earth".
9. He stated, before the United Nations, that, "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.", yet he has no issues with Muslims and others (including himself) slandering Jesus and Christians.
10. His favorite book - Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky - was dedicated to Lucifer: “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.” That quote is on the opening page.
So, considering all the facts, it's no real surprise that he's doing this. Since he took office, the push to criminalize any public Christian activity has increased by leaps and bounds.
I can't help but noting, right on the first page, how some, instead of discussing the topic from the OP, want to come in and criticize Christians and Christianity, instead. The hypocrisy is astounding.
So what? No where in the Constitution does it state the president must be a "christian";
Plan B One-Step® (levonorgestrel) is intended to prevent pregnancy after known or suspected contraceptive failure or unprotected intercourse.
Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
What "abortion pill"? The "morning after" pill only delays ovulation; It DOES NOT stop implantation.
The normal menstrual cycle is altered, delaying ovulation; or
Ovulation is inhibited, meaning the egg will not be released from the ovary;
It can irritate the lining of the uterus (endometrium) so as to inhibit implantation.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Abortion is legal in the United States. The radical Christians have to get over it and move on. That war was fought and lost. There are no more battles.
But the radical Christians will just keep re-opening the abortion debate until they get their way. That's what I mean when I say they are intent on imposing their beliefs on others. It's all they think about. They can't accept the fact that abortions are legal.
As usual, you pro-aborts have it all backwards and upside down. This thread isn't about whether abortion is legal or not. This thread is about whether the government should be able to FORCE a Christian-owned company to PAY for abortions for their employees. It's about the government forcing their beliefs on a Christian business owner. This is not complicated, and it amazes me how many can't see the issue through their hate.
Originally posted by Timing
reply to post by dogstar23
The problem is in your argument the coverage of insulin for Diabetics is perfectly sane because insulin saves a Diabetics life.
There is absolutely no data to back up that a patient will die if not given the morning after pill. Meaning, a person will not die if the Morning After Pill is withheld from being prescribed.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by kthxbai
No, "radical christians" are NOT a vast majority of this nation, not even a SLIGHT majority of this nation. If they were a majority, we wouldn't be having this conversation because that "evil obama who is out to destroy everything they believe in" would not have been elected. The people doing this are not Christians, they are not a majority and they will not succeed. They are an extremist group just like the other extremist group that attacks us as a country. They are no different from the jihadists, they are cut from the same cloth.
If they were a "vast majority", then they would have their way, Obama wouldn't be president, all the opposition to them would have been squashed and we'd be living in a theocracy because that's what they want. They are not a majority at all, THANK GOD!
Are you actually claiming that people who don't want to pay for abortion pills for their employees are terrorists? That's sure what it sounds like you are saying.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Mad Simian
*snip*
It can NOT say that one group is exempt and another is not. It MUST take the position that, barring the violation of basic civil rights, it must take no position and leave the decision to do or not do so in the hands of the individual citizen. AND, that is EXACTLY the position it has taken in this case. It is NOT forcing any particular person to make the decision but is simply allowing the right to the choice.
*snip*
Actually, they ARE stating that some groups are exempt, on religious grounds, but that Christians cannot be. Apparently, you didn't read enough to see the issue.
They are NOT allowing a choice at all.
Originally posted by TheComte
Abortion is legal in the United States. The radical Christians have to get over it and move on. That war was fought and lost. There are no more battles.
Originally posted by kthxbai
It doesn't matter WHO owns the business, it's a business and it has to abide by the law. Other businesses aren't exempt due to the religion of their owners. There was a link given about INDIVIDUAL asking for exemptions and the INDIVIDUALs who own that business can ask for their own exemptions. However, they cannot refuse to give them to their employees. NO business can.
When they make themselves a for-profit business, they lose any exemption based on religion. That's how it works. If not, then every single business in America would claim some type of religious belief and none of them would pay taxes, provide insurance or anything else. The line is drawn between for-profit and not-for-profit. Hobby Lobby is a for-profit business and they have to abide by the laws. PERIOD.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Abortion is legal in the United States. The radical Christians have to get over it and move on. That war was fought and lost. There are no more battles.
But the radical Christians will just keep re-opening the abortion debate until they get their way. That's what I mean when I say they are intent on imposing their beliefs on others. It's all they think about. They can't accept the fact that abortions are legal.
As usual, you pro-aborts have it all backwards and upside down. This thread isn't about whether abortion is legal or not. This thread is about whether the government should be able to FORCE a Christian-owned company to PAY for abortions for their employees. It's about the government forcing their beliefs on a Christian business owner. This is not complicated, and it amazes me how many can't see the issue through their hate.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by kthxbai
It doesn't matter WHO owns the business, it's a business and it has to abide by the law. Other businesses aren't exempt due to the religion of their owners. There was a link given about INDIVIDUAL asking for exemptions and the INDIVIDUALs who own that business can ask for their own exemptions. However, they cannot refuse to give them to their employees. NO business can.
When they make themselves a for-profit business, they lose any exemption based on religion. That's how it works. If not, then every single business in America would claim some type of religious belief and none of them would pay taxes, provide insurance or anything else. The line is drawn between for-profit and not-for-profit. Hobby Lobby is a for-profit business and they have to abide by the laws. PERIOD.
First off, businesses should not be forced to provide insurance. Second, they should not be forced to provide drugs that go against their religious beliefs. These are not doctors, or drug companies. There should be no government involvement in whether or not they offer insurance or not.
Plus, when SOME businesses are given religious exemptions, and others are not, that's clear bias. This is not complicated.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
reply to post by kthxbai
From this point forward, do not expect a reply from me on anything you post.
You crossed the line.
Originally posted by SourGrapes
Originally posted by TheComte
Abortion is legal in the United States. The radical Christians have to get over it and move on. That war was fought and lost. There are no more battles.
Owning a gun in the U.S. is not only legal, it is my right! Therefore, those private companies and government buildings that do not allow me to carry my gun(s) on their property are impeding my RIGHT to carry.
Funny thing, since THAT is in the constitution! Abortion is not. So, shouldn't I be allowed to carry my gun inside any business that I choose? After all, it is the business owner that needs to get over it, as guns are legal.
Originally posted by TheComte
Are you for real? It amazes me you don't see the difference. I'm not pro-abortion. I'm actually against it personally. I just don't impose my beliefs on others like you seem to want to do. The abortion question has been debated, a decision has been rendered and it has been held up by the Supreme Court of the land. The anti-abortionists lost. It's a simple question of law.
Abortions are to be made available. That is the law. No business owner, Christian or not, can take that away from a citizen. It's so simple I'm shocked you radicals are clouded by your own hate and can't see the obvious.