It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
reply to post by DerekJR321
And my argument is that the Holocaust happened and that people should take a look at the mountain of evidence and believe it.
Originally posted by kurthall
CLEARLY you did not read the LINKS that the OP put up...It was NOT 50 or so SS guards, talk about not researching...LOL it was between 122-520...YOU sir need to research before you post!
Originally posted by SteveR
And focusing on 520 does justice to the over a million other German POWs killed in American captivity?
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Originally posted by opethPA
reply to post by DerekJR321
That still doesn't answer my question...Do you believe the Holocaust happened, never happened or happened to more then just the Jewish people?
If you are asking me if I believe the "official" version of the Holocaust, as taught to us today is true? Then the answer is 100% NO. I DO NOT BELIEVE THE "HOLOCAUST" HAPPENED IN THE WAY WE ARE TAUGHT.
Is that clear enough for you?
Originally posted by opethPA
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Originally posted by opethPA
reply to post by DerekJR321
That still doesn't answer my question...Do you believe the Holocaust happened, never happened or happened to more then just the Jewish people?
If you are asking me if I believe the "official" version of the Holocaust, as taught to us today is true? Then the answer is 100% NO. I DO NOT BELIEVE THE "HOLOCAUST" HAPPENED IN THE WAY WE ARE TAUGHT.
Is that clear enough for you?
So what you are saying is you don't believe the photos or information here is accurate?
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by tg_spider
and wikipedia is not a reliable source of info .......u must know thatedit on 31-12-2012 by tg_spider because: ......
Eugenic policies were first implemented in the early 1900s in the United States.[8] Later, in the 1920s and 30s, the eugenic policy of sterilizing certain mental patients was implemented in a variety of other countries, including Belgium,[9] Brazil,[10] Canada,[11] and Sweden,[12] among others.
At its peak of popularity eugenics was supported by a wide variety of prominent people, including Winston Churchill,[40] Margaret Sanger,[41][42] Marie Stopes, H. G. Wells, Theodore Roosevelt, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Linus Pauling[43] and Sidney Webb.[44][45][46] Many members of the American Progressive Movement supported eugenics, enticed by its scientific trappings and its promise to cure social ills. Its most infamous proponent and practitioner was, however, Adolf Hitler who praised and incorporated eugenic ideas in Mein Kampf and emulated Eugenic legislation for the sterilization of "defectives" that had been pioneered in the United States.[47]
The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (KWI-A) was founded in 1927. The Rockefeller Foundation supported both the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. The Rockefeller Foundation partially funded the actual building of the Institute and helped keep the Institute afloat during the Depression.
Fischer, Verschuer, Magnussen and many others involved in medical anthropology during the Third Reich were never prosecuted as war criminals, though it was recommended several times, because it was feared that the German public would utterly lose confidence in both German science and the German medical establishment; thus, the political transition after World War II, into the Cold War, would not be disrupted.
Originally posted by tg_spider
ok opetha i don't what to argue with you .....you believe what you want ...... take care
Originally posted by opethPA
So what you are saying is you don't believe the photos or information here is accurate?
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Originally posted by opethPA
So what you are saying is you don't believe the photos or information here is accurate?
en.wikipedia.org...
No. I don't believe Wikipedia is an accurate source of information. Especially since I myself can edit it and put in whatever I want. In fact, the internet as a whole is a poor source of "accurate" information. The net is full of nothing but "opinions". Therefor TRUTH can never be proven via the internet.