reply to post by jdub297
Morgan has used his position to harangue, bully and ridicule American guests whose views he and your neighbors disagree with.
I watched the interview that started all this and I didnt see anything wrong or unique in what he did or said.
His insult at the end came out of frustration and to be honest I dont blame him, the guy was an idiot and in my opinion so is anyone else who feels
the problem of gun massacres can be solved by having more guns around.
In the interview in question he didnt use stats just common sense
Perhaps if he had a bit less hubris and actually attempted rational discussion instead of nonsensical ravings and rants, "freedom loving members"
would give him a bit more respoect. He'll never have any credibility. Why should we permit foreign visitors and aliens, including pretend-journalists
such as PM, the "freedom" to inflame and antagonize on our airwaves solely to drive their egos and ratings higher with imaginary "news" and
"facts" drawn from thin air and their personal biases, demons and delusions?
Who are you to decide what his motivations were? sounds like your being a bit biased and maybe even delusional. He simply stated his views which Im
guessing is a part of the program like many other American journalists or show hosts do.
Your comment that "Hell never have any credibility" shows that you have preejudged him and makes your opinion basically invalid
You reveal a complete lack of understanding how a written Constitution functions, or of the responsibilities attendant to the freedoms recognized
Can you point out in the 1st Amendment or constitution where it says legal residents arent entitled to the same rights? In my ignorance and lack of
understanding the constitution says the rights are self evident and god given not applicable exclusively to people whos mothers happen to birth them
on US soil.
You're all a group of subservient, inbred pawns.
Im Australian not English, my gov is a lot less restrictive and intrusive than yours but since we arent allowed easy access to guns I doubt you see it
Once again, ignorance of a wrtiien constitution prevents you from grasping differences recognized in our courts. not all constitutional protections
apply to everyone within our borders; some apply to "citizens," some to "persons," and some to "people." See the recent Guizar decision for bit
Modern interpretations of an ancient document, could easily have been interpreted a different way. Hes not an illegal.
If it can be reinterpreted so can the 2nd but since that wouldnt suit your preferences you wouldnt agree with that.
The big article you quoted, I fail to see how it applies to this situation, so me something that applies to the right to free speech coz thats what
were talking about, not medicare or illegal aliens.
The Uk sounds like an ideal for you and PM to stay. There, the government tells you what your "rights" are, not a written Constitution.
Once again Im Aussie and your gov doesnt dictate what rights your entitled to?
Patriot act!!!! You have no rights if your gov decides so and its right there in writing for anyone to see.
Congrats on your "Freedom"
Since when does a foreign, disgraced pretend-journalist decide what is "enough for protection" in this country, or in my house? Regardles of the
liniked story, PM has been outspoken for quite some time about his beliefs and disdain for American rights (of which he is all too eager to take
Get your facts straight, 1 Right not Rights plural and anyone who isnt blinded by an unhealthy love of guns would agree there is no reason for the
average citizen to have a high powered rapid fire weapon in their home.
What gives him ANY authority to opine what weapons belong "in the hands of the public?"
How about common sense?
Journalist and pundits have often referred to "high-powered rifles," and "assault style weapons" without any regard for the truth or actual
meanings of the phrases.
Are you calling for these other journalistrs or pundits to be silenced? sounds like the only thing hes done wrong or differently is being English.
I would say high powered or assault style applies to weapons that spit a ridiculous amount of shots in a short spurt. As is probably obvious I know
bugger all about guns, the only thing I know for certain is they are a weapon whos sole purpose is to kill, they are not a "tool" unless you count
killing as a use/purpose.
As we speak, the UK is considering long knves as "assault weapons"
No its not, your talking about the 5 year old article posted on here recently
Your quoting of this as fact takes away from your credibility