When will the ATS community wake up and stop spouting the party line that Islam is a 'religion of peace'..?
Thanks OP for highlighting some of the Truth.
Islam is brutal, backwards, sadistic, perverse (etc). The evidence is stacked up around the globe, plain as day, well-documented in this internet age
- and even if you don't believe in the spiritual principles I hint at shortly, you can see with your own eyes that 'peace' is NOT what Islam was
designed for, or what it has become.
Islamic 'holy texts' are full of spiritual deception/ 'heresies', designed to subvert the world's opinions of Judeo-Christian tradition &
theology, and to subjugate/ eliminate followers of the Judeo-Christian way (and those of all other faith). Islam is carefully crafted to veil its
hatred of YHWH, Yeshua & the Judaic prophets, via a modicum of pretense at 'respect' for Judeo-Christian believers..
Quranic (& other related) texts detail slightly less harsh penalties for Judeo-Christian believers who have been conquered by Islamic raiders, when
compared to - for example - Hindu & Buddhist believers, who are to be mercilessly exterminated. To eliminate free thought & creative expression in
all non-Islamic faith groups/ philosophical traditions, to ensure a male-dominated tribal system (where women and girls are literally playthings to be
abused at will) - these are also foremost amongst the sick & twisted goals to be achieved by 'true' Muslims.
By offering a pretense at 'respect' for Judeo-Christian tradition, the world is duped into thinking that the Islamic faith is a genuine component of
Abrahamic theology, when in fact it can be conclusively proven that this is not the case. Sadly, even modern scholars have allowed themselves to be
conned into believing that there is a genuine place for Islam alongside Judeo-Christian theology, philosophy, tradition & moral values - despite the
facts of the matter: The Quran contradicts even the most basic of the Judaic moral/ theological principles, and works very hard, very cleverly, to
pour cold water on the legacy of Christ & His closest followers.
The leaders of Islamic thought have been promoting monstrous, diabolical 'fatwas', based upon tenuous expositions/ re-imaginings of Mohammedan
proclivities, for century after century. This is relevant to our understanding of what Islam (in its essence) is, because Mohammed was a paedophile &
an abuser of women - a man who encouraged other men to abuse women, to have sexual intercourse with girls at least as young as nine years old.
Mohammed was a deceptive, dishonorable warlord, and trained his followers to be the same. He brutally crushed all opposition, frowning upon those
that showed mercy.
He was most certainly NOT the sort of person whom the Almighty would choose as a prophet, considering that the 'final prophet' of Abrahamic
tradition, in the person of Jesus, had arrived on the scene six hundred years earlier, announcing that:
3 “God blesses those who are poor and realize their need for him,
for the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs.
4 God blesses those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 God blesses those who are humble,
for they will inherit the whole earth.
6 God blesses those who hunger and thirst for justice,
for they will be satisfied.
7 God blesses those who are merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 God blesses those whose hearts are pure,
for they will see God.
9 God blesses those who work for peace,
for they will be called the children of God.
10 God blesses those who are persecuted for doing right,
for the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs.
Christ also stated plainly that anyone who harmed a child should consider himself in for deep trouble with the ruling authorities of the Universe. He
stated clearly that such an abuser would be better off to tie a millstone around his neck and be thrown to the depths of the ocean, than to suffer the
punishment he would receive following crimes against children.
So why would an abuser of children be selected to carry on prophetic work in the 'Abrahamic tradition'..?? Why, when such prophetic work was
finished by Christ, does Islam contradict His words & legacy so completely..??
Makes sense ONLY if an enemy of Christ was the hidden hand behind the formation of Islam...
NB - Slight addition to rant -
Muslims are only moderate (and therefore, decent human beings) if they deny several of the central tenets and instructions of their 'prophet', and
those of the Caliphs & other Islamic leaders in the centuries since Mohammed shuffled off this mortal coil.
'Islamic Extremists' should more accurately be labelled as 'Islamic Fundamentalists' - that is, they should be understood by the people of all
nations as those Muslims who apply the full instructions/ guidance of Mohammed and the Caliphs, and are therefore 'truly Islamic' - showing the true
colours of the false religion known to this world as Islam.