reply to post by bknapple32
Her lying about a source being a founding member of the Freemasons vs at article you are picking and choosing words from snopes is different. And if you can't see that I'm sorry.
You said it would debunk the "myth" it did not...
She said he was a "founding member" he was not.... Same principle
And validating the credibility of a source and the OP who is presenting it as fact (despite the fox news tactic of you decide) is absolutely on topic.
I was not implying that it was off topic, you was repeating that she lied, which is why I said maybe we should move on, as it had been addressed and corrected.
The you decide! Adding in the name of fox news is a tactic of your own is it not, to associate the op with a shoddy news outlet. We have choice of what we want to believe, ladyk has posted her evidence and then said "you decide" which imo is not the same as saying...."everything I have posted is fact" which you are trying to imply.