posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 10:26 AM
Originally posted by TRUELIES11
I think that science is more accepting of spirituality than spirituality is of science.
edit on 28-12-2012 by TRUELIES11 because: (no reason
From my perspective I would argue that spirituality is without a doubt more accepting of science than science of spirituality. I see many religious
and spiritual beings who are adapting scientific discoveries into their current belief system. I see this as the need to find balance between the
physical and non-physical where one can be wholly satisfied with one's perspective.
Science on the other hand never adapts spirituality into their beliefs simply because it is not scientific, it is not tangible, not physical. Now, the
science I speak of is the extreme of science, or the polarity on one end of the spectrum between science and spirituality, or the physical and
non-physical. Now one is capable of looking at spirituality scientifically, which is what many are doing now, and also capable of looking at science
The idea of philosophy that is spoken of here in this thread could be inferred as a point somewhere in between these two polarities, as philosophy is
not bound by physical, nor non-physical. Currently humanity is so fixed on the one, or the other and it is not simply one or the other, it is the
EVERYTHING that lies between the one or the other. The reason duality exists is so that the universe does not have to be one or the other, but can
attempt to balance itself between two points so that EVERYTHING may be experienced.