{Gun Control} Facebook bans Gandhi quote as part of revisionist history purge , page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 12:22 AM by NarrowGate
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan



IDC about that. I am all for people getting support and contacting their families.

The rest of your post is right though. It monitors the population and is immensely useful in controlling popular opinion - not only that people post every detail on there.

Not to mention the criminals. If someone wants to hurt you or your family all they need is your FB.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 12:25 AM by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by NarrowGate




I contact and communicate with family all the time. And all without a FB account.

Society actually was able to coherently exist before Zuckerberg was ever even born. Believe it or not.



reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 12:28 AM by glassspider
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan



Im saying you get banned from any and all websites that you dont own if you break the rules. So just keep repeating that ats is different to facebook to anybody who doesnt share your beliefs it wasnt the point.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 12:32 AM by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by glassspider
reply to
post by bigfatfurrytexan



Im saying you get banned from any and all websites that you dont own if you break the rules. So just keep repeating that ats is different to facebook to anybody who doesnt share your beliefs it wasnt the point.


Well....there you have it.

No need to consider what I am saying, because it doesn't support your point.

LOL, carry on then.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 12:33 AM by GBP/JPY
reply to post by SilentKoala



right on, man....some one please put on the pic of the famous..."Godzilla facepalm"


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 01:22 AM by th3dudeabides
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Facebook has always been this totalitarian. Why are you surprised! I'm not, that's why I never made an account with those assholes. Anybody using facebook is a chump. Anybody still using facebook wants to be censored.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 01:22 AM by Rezlooper
reply to post by ModernAcademia



You know when Facebook was first coming up and Myspace was still in the lead, I heard the urban myth that Facebook was backed by the government, or even part-owned, like maybe those initial investors that Zuckerberg pulled in were reps of the government. Although suspicious, I never bought into it, but with all the actions they have been doing as of late, I'm beginning to wonder.

We already know they have deep ties through lobbying. They have an office of lobbyists in Washington and one of the missions it to strengthen ties with the intelligence community. Why the intelligence community?

Does it actually go further than an office of lobbyists? Why would Facebook go after accounts that are supportive of the 2nd amendment? What's in it for them? It's not to protect anybody because as the Natural News story says, you can post a call for the murder of the head of the NRA, so this clearly demonstrates that Facebook has chosen a side, the side of the Obama Admin.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 01:30 AM by Screwed
reply to post by ModernAcademia



I quoted this earier today and it is still there.
Will let you know if this changes.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 02:16 AM by SteveR
reply to post by Jameliel



Originally posted by Jameliel
Im going to quote it on Facebook and see what happens.


Let us know what happens. I'd like to see this verified also.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 02:27 AM by NarrowGate
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to
post by NarrowGate




I contact and communicate with family all the time. And all without a FB account.

Society actually was able to coherently exist before Zuckerberg was ever even born. Believe it or not.


I agree, and I do not use FB. I am supportive of people contacting family and getting support - and they should be able to do so easily.

That said, Facebook is not necessary for that.

The thing is, you said you are not sentimental enough for it, as if that were a requirement for uh...something.

I know you were being somewhat sarcastic, just explaining my response that's all. Maybe the reason for the confusion is a misinterpreted of what I already thought you intended to be a gray area of your statement.


reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 03:34 AM by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by SilentKoala



I did too, lol. Even left them a little comment.


Suck it boys in suits. You don't scare me.


By the way; don't troll me guys about being able to google that quote so it show up on Facebook. I don't care if they know me or not.

They don't scare me. I'm looking forward to the day some G-man shows up at my door, thinking he is gonna tell me how # is run. Mr. Eskrima say otherwise
edit on 29-12-2012 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags