posted on Dec, 29 2012 @ 08:35 PM
The US does have a very strong military, but that is only because of our HUGE defense budget. They want to talk about cutting social services and
things like medicare, instead of saving billions by downsizing our army. Really though it is not that the US military is exceptionally large, as most
of the money being spent on defense is being spent on these charades overseas. Despite the fact that our military is large and strong, there is
absolutely NO way that the US military could take over the world.
The US would have their hands full in a war with just one or two nations. You have to realize that quite a bit of the military technology that the US
possesses is also utilized by many other countries. As the US has learned in all recent wars, air superiority is key to defeating the military of
another country. With that said, the anti-aircraft weaponry now available by a variety of countries is quite advanced, and because of this, it will
actually take many boots on the ground to defeat a large and modern military.
The missile defense systems that are available now are also relatively advanced. Incoming missiles can actually be shot down from a good distance away
now. What I am saying is that for much of the advanced weaponry that the US possesses, there is a piece of weaponry to counter it. Albeit the US does
have bombers that likely can avoid being shot down, either because they fly extremely high, or because their stealth capability is extremely advanced,
but weaponry like this is likely classified. I also think that there are nuclear nations out there, who when facing defeat, would feel they have
nothing to lose and launch a nuclear weapon. This possibility alone means that the US must be extremely careful who they start a conflict with.
So militarily taking over the world is highly improbable, not just because of the reasons I outlined above, but for many others as well. The real way
to take over a country is to do it covertly. Control the monetary system and the government, and you control a country. Military action would be used
only to "keep" the country already taken. But really there needn't be a large occupation force in my opinion...at least not in developed countries.
There are so many variables that it is very hard to tell if I am correct or completely wrong, but I think I am on the right track.
Also, the American people are so fed up with conflict that there is no way they would go for an all out war against another developed and equipped, or
modern, nation. These conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are not costing as many lives as say, Vietnam, but still the people are sick of it. Although
many Americans were sick of Vietnam, and yet the government did not listen initially and pull out. Instead, Nixon leaves office and the new president
pulls out the troops, effectively causing us to lose a war that was almost won. Why do you think that North Vietnam had begun peace negotiations? Once
we ratcheted up the bombings on northern cities like Hanoi, the NVA was falling apart. It is hard to believe that American soldiers killed over 1
million NVA and insurgent soldiers, while losing only 60,000.
Anyway, my point is that Americans have not forgotten these past wars and conflicts, and there is no way they would stand the same amount of
casualties in a modern day war. And if the US invaded a modern country, with a modern military, there would be many more casualties this time around.
What I am saying is that the US cannot and will not get away with being the aggressor against a modern militarized nation.