Fast and Furious Afghanistan: More Illegal Weapons in The Hands of The Enemy? , page 16


Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 318 times


reply posted on 9-1-2013 @ 05:54 PM by Jblake
reply to post by Zarniwoop


Originally posted by Zarniwoop Pg 6

Mr Timmins could in fact be a bit of a serial employment extortionist. Albeit not a very good one.

Its all well sitting back and passing comments on something you don’t know about so I will correct you with some facts not speculation.

Timmons was bound by a High Court injunction which meant he was not allowed to speak to anyone about what occurred even in defence and was actually threatened with imprisonment by a High Court judge.

The USDA did send a top investigator to him and was shocked at what was going on but Timmons was unable to speak to him further, however the Chinees government also visited and rejected 7 out of 11 factories for the same reasons Timmons outlined as major health concerns so I hope you take this fact onboard that Timmons was doing his job and had valid concerns and the Chinees Govt verified it.

Nov 2007 some 7 years latter, Timmons while in Iraq working for DoS, was then sent a Discontinuance of the High court injunction meaning he was left unable to speak out or defend himself for seven years from comments and speculators such as your self.
Timmons did not extort anything but lost his job by doing his job by the book which was validated independently and without bias.

In regards to Afghanistan, which is where and how this thread started and should remain focused, the company admitted fault, in writing and verbally where all Timmins requested was his wages and written apologies from those involved in his kidnapping and assault and a thorough investigation into the senior manages involvement with the illegal activities where the company agreed then went silent realising they were in very deep doodaa..

Too many people look the other way these days and to call someone an extortionist for standing up and doing what’s right or what they are meant to do is not right..

As for your comment” threats are to be immediately reported to security personnel”
Timmons immediately on finding the first lot of RPG’s actually leaving the compound and Bulk Fuel Installation in one of the escorts guard vehicles, reported the finding firstly to the long standing compliance office, (Ex Australian Police officer) who was standing next to him, then Timmins wrote a quick note on the compliance sheets he was holding regarding the date time, events etc. (a short SITREP), then Timmons wrote and intelligence report, then contacted his top manager all within the hour while all of these other senior staff did nothing except the senior manager who insisted Timmons not to do anything about it, but Timmons did!

Your comment “Something is amiss here something does not add up to me”.

Me too, this # should not have occurred and to have a company flatly deny events then admits events is something the Authorities need to look at and I believe that’s why this tread is started.

Having our gals and guys shafted and even killed for profit or by gross negligence stinks!!

FYI.
The company even changed its name a few times to try to get away from its original name Compass as in the US Armed Services Report but the same people are there, left unaccountable for what happened..

Blatant fraud is one thing, but Employing, harbouring and Arming the enemy and even transporting and the re-issuing them with heavy illegal arms, the same arms used at Bastion killing military, is no laughing matter!!

Re your comment “Could you post a link to this letter, or even an excerpt” perhaps?
Yes I could but wont..
You get a senator to look into this or contact me and yes you can get a copy along with other classified docs and recordings.
My opinion there seems to be too much info that has been disclosed already and may prejudice and compromise any future inquiry as these discussions also prepares the company and as we say Fore Warned is Fore Armed..


reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 12:18 AM by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes


He wasnt in the military, I think that he didnt get the attention any where else for almost every reason I have talked about on this thread, I personally think he is a fraud. Maybe you can change my mind


As I stated...
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Bastion was attacked, so there was a problem somewhere. If there were guards, motion sensors, etc., and no one spotted the attackers, that seems to indicate an inside job. it's not impossible for military to be involved, either. Remember the Ft. Hood case? That was a military officer, and he killed a lot of people. Why would anyone assume there could not be others like him in the military?


The Ft. Hood shooter was in the military. That's who I meant, not this Timmons fellow. Just realized what you had posted before regarding that. I used that example to show that just because someone is military, it doesn't automatically mean they could not be set against the country. That shooter was, and some that Timmons encountered could have been as well. It's not common, but it happens.


reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 12:25 AM by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Jblake
reply to post by Brotherman



LadyGreeneyes,
With respect, here you go again, wishy washy, say Timmons is a fraud now the company leies, so which is it?
Who has most to gain?
Who admits fault?
Who has independent witnesses that no one has spoken to?
Who has documents supporting the military ballsed it up?
The company in question has a long extensive and documented history of the things Timmons reports.
The US Armed Services report, that I suggest you read, also supports Timmons accounts.

For you to suggest Timmons was at fault and he should be tried makes me wonder what are you drinking these days?


When did I suggest any such thing? I have defended his position, and stated that he seems to have a good case. I said it is POSSIBLE that he is lying, but I don't see that as likely. I have even stated that, if he were lying, you would think he'd have been prosecuted for slander by now, which seems to not have happened, further supporting his position. I will consider all points of view, until (if that happens) there is a proper investigation, but that doesn't mean I don't support his position. I am not sure how you got that impression from my posts.
Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^