posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 05:46 PM
It is not meant to give citizens weapons to fight their country's military. It is meant in case the Gestapo sends you to "relocation camps" which
coincidentally, have smokestacks burning ash 24/7... The intended use is right before they ask you to, "Step into ze showa, no puuushingk no
The intended purpose, you will see in small towns where the community bonds are stronger than official bonds. When a police officer might try and
arrest a local and he say, "Wade, get the %$#@ off my lawn. Pull your little Mr. Policeman stunt again and I will whoop your ass at the next
Christmas dinner you come to..."
It's one of those things where, a completely obedient, helpless group of people who are being taken advantage of might walk themselves to their
demise, but someone armed might stand up and say, "over my dead body."
Personally, I don't believe the US has come anywhere close to "A police state" as many would like to portray on the internet. Rife with inequality
sure, unfair and unjust in many cases? Absolutely. Not the point where any use of arms by the citizen is justified. I think many on the net who claim
they are fighting for their rights do an injustice unto themselves. For now, the changes in government and rule has all been done by political means.
In some cases, corrupt political means.
But it is up to those people who believe in their inherent rights to fight the system by the same method. Until lives are threatened directly, a
person defending themselves while exercising their 2nd amendment rights is not justified.
I think this is where the lines get blurry, and the misrepresentation makes gun proponents look like deliverance cast members...