CIVIL WAR: Senate To Go For Handguns, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 81 times


reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 05:39 PM by boymonkey74
reply to post by ajay59



Ok next question when has 11 or 19 people attacked you? and do you think they might?
Also guy on drugs ok, I'm pretty sure 9 rounds will put him down.
Oh whats the point, you lot just chat on how you will evade the law IF it passes and what you will really do because 90% of you are just blowing hot air and in reality you will do nothing.


reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 05:45 PM by SubTruth
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to
post by ajay59



Ok next question when has 11 or 19 people attacked you? and do you think they might?
Also guy on drugs ok, I'm pretty sure 9 rounds will put him down.
Oh whats the point, you lot just chat on how you will evade the law IF it passes and what you will really do because 90% of you are just blowing hot air and in reality you will do nothing.




To be honest why do you even care? I mean you live across a ocean in another country. To be honest I think all you Brits want us to share in the misery that your freedoms have become. Misery loves company and always will.


Instead of worrying about something that will not effect you why not go out and help someone in your local community or join your local council.
edit on 27-12-2012 by SubTruth because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 05:48 PM by boymonkey74
reply to post by SubTruth



So next time something happens in a place other than the USA you will keep Shhh and not comment.
I have an interest in the USA because my son lives in NYC and is an American THATS why I care.
But again I bid this thread goodbye and I will leave you all to fantasize about the big nasty Government coming for your guns.
One last thing..Freedom? you really think any of us are free lol you have fallen for the biggest con on the planet.
Night all.
edit on 27-12-2012 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 05:54 PM by samhouston1886
reply to post by boymonkey74



Guns are not Magic Sir, they jam, bullets go bad, bad guys high on drugs can sometimes take 10 rounds and shrug it off.. Please.... please... please stay out of the discussion if you lack even the most basic common sense understanding of self defense and firearms..

Its not appropriate for a Architect to tell a Doctor how to do his job, why are clueless people trying to change the way I can protect my family?

IF you cant understand that, please see below..




reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 05:54 PM by 11235813213455
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
reply to
post by 11235813213455



that i think is gonna be another unforeseen consequence of this IF it passes imagine all the insurance claims on "boating accidents" or "theft" or simply the amount of misplaced fire arms (like what happened after Canada repealed its long gun ban suddenly guns started popping back into existence)


Funny how that works isn't it?

I have no earthly clue why they think this will work the way they are selling it. The United States presumably learned its lesson the last time they tried a prohibition measure on this scale and it gave rise to the Mafia.


reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 06:02 PM by samhouston1886
reply to post by boymonkey74



Dont Worry, only the criminals and police have guns in New York, trust me I know this firsthand.

Your Son is more likely to get killed by one of the aforementioned groups than a lawfully Armed Citizen of this Great Country because they are rarer than you could imagine.

If he is attacked, the legal system expects him to die and it is one of my sincerest regrets that people in New York City... where I was born..where I served...have to live this way..


Its the main reason I no longer live there..



reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 06:06 PM by eriktheawful
reply to post by boymonkey74



Some guns were made with magazines that exceed 10 rounds.

For example my son owns a Marlin Camp Carbine and uses a 12 round magazine.

It's simply how the gun was designed. Banning high capacity magazines would do nothing. Any semiautomatic pistol can have it's magazine changed in less than 2 seconds.


reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 06:18 PM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by MrSpad



Wrong, not the same law at all.
During those years the made changes to guns (like norinco adding a thumbhole/dragonov style stock to "assault" weapons so they could still be sold. They also removed bayonett lugs so they could still be sold. Under that law people could still own semi auto weapons. This one bans thumbholes, it bans any gun with one "military" style characteristic. It is total ignorance to call this the same law.


reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 06:18 PM by angrysniper
Originally posted by samhouston1886
reply to
post by boymonkey74



Dont Worry, only the criminals and police have guns in New York, trust me I know this firsthand.

Your Son is more likely to get killed by one of the aforementioned groups than a lawfully Armed Citizen of this Great Country because they are rarer than you could imagine.

If he is attacked, the legal system expects him to die and it is one of my sincerest regrets that people in New York City... where I was born..where I served...have to live this way..


Its the main reason I no longer live there..


nvm
edit on 27-12-2012 by angrysniper because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-12-2012 @ 06:28 PM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ausername



Oh so so very wrong. You can pick any two states in the country, if you had just the people with hunting licenses from two states decide to strike out, you would have a one million man army. The government can't very well use their technology against civilians either. Imagine fighting an assymetrical war against a one million man army where you couldn't afford ANY reports of collatoral damage.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^