It's like my old social studies teacher used to say. "Every country needs a good revolution once and a while. Keeps everyone in check."

Hopefully it doesn't come down to that.

-SAP-

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

Originally posted by MrSpad
If people would lay crazy claims like civil war and present infomation as it is and not full of hyperbole it might help
this credibility of this place.

WTF do you mean help the credibility of this place? ATS is more credible than you are, spouting all that BS. Facts are facts, and ATS does a damn good job, as a whole, of sorting fact from fiction. So show me the fiction, cause what I have presented, as did Drudge, is reality. They ARE INDEED coming for your guns.

So civil war is coming? Really? They are coming for my guns? With this law? You know the same one we lived with for ten years 1994 through 2004? I know gun laws are lighter than ever before but to try and make it seem like this is not something gun owers lived with for 10 years and had not problems is nothing but, hyperbole and foolishness. That is even if it could get passed. Which is unlikely at best.

Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

No it is excactly the same law. Word for word.

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
What I find telling is that there is no draft of the bill available for public viewing.

Yeah, they're pulling another Pelosi:

"We must pass this bill so you can find out what's in it."



Washington scum, pure and simple.

good

no need for high capacity magazines

all these guns really provide, in any practical sense, is the ability of the owner to fantasize about using them and to feel like a tough guy

and statistics show they will more lilkely be used by the owner on a family member, or agaisnt the owner than on an intruder

"happiness is a warm gun...bang bang shoot shoot"

sweet dreams

Damn.... All my firearms were stolen in a break-in.

Gun control my ........
Another wealth redistribution scheme. Grab more, more dollars, more........
The Beast hungers.........

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
What I find telling is that there is no draft of the bill available for public viewing.

Yeah, they're pulling another Pelosi:

"We must pass this bill so you can find out what's in it."

A billion dollar payoff to the NRA lobbyists to stay out of it, and keep quiet?

Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

No it is excactly the same law. Word for word.

No, it isn't. Go and read the 1994 law and then re-read that summary and note the differences.

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

How about 11,15 or even 19 attackers. Anything else?

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

When you're attacked by more than one person, for example, or when that person is on drugs. I don't know how many people you've shot, but they don't just magically fall down and die when you hit them once unless you get really, really lucky.. or they aren't moving and you can actually aim at their head. In which case, I probably wouldn't mention it.