It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
You can talk all big and bad but when the time comes, you will fall right into line just like those before you did.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Can I point out that it would ban magazines containing more than ten rounds for handguns, not handguns themselves. Can I also add that there's never been a war in American history to keep hold of handguns? I fail to see anything in this proposed bill - if this is an accurate account of it - that couldn't be described as being sane.
Originally posted by MysterX
reply to post by L8RT8RZ
You're forgetting one thing.
The 'authorities' or at least their enforcers, Military, police, CIA, FBI and all the rest are FULL of patriots too.
While yes, if violence came from attempting a treasonous attack on the constitution, some people will probably die, on both sides of the divide, but your scenario of a million people looking back for support from the people, only to find nobody there, could apply to the authorities just as well as the people....and the people are in the massive majority, with massive support from the 'inside'.
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Here is the bottom line. Believe it or not. If this "Feinstein" bill somehow manages to pass, there will be an uprising against this Government not seen since the Civil War. And that is the truth.
You can say I'm overreacting. You can say I'm crazy. But there is no way that people will let the 2nd Amendment be trampled on like this. Sure, there are those of you who "don't get it" and think everything in this provision is fine. But it's not.
Ban the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable magazine and at least one “military characteristic”
Do you realize how broad that is?
Debate it all yo want. There is a huge MAJORITY of gun owners in America. And this move is just a big mistake.
No there won't. People will sit back and talk big and bad and do absolutely NOTHING, just like they always do. Nothing will be done except griping about it, just like everything else.
We shall see. Yes... most American's sit on their ass and do nothing when its menial things. But America is much more than just the East and West coast. (And I'm from NY). There are over 350 million legally owned guns in this country. The Feds want em? Come and take em. Some will bow to pressure. Millions will not. What kind of statistics you think will come out of that?
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by ajay59
Ok next question when has 11 or 19 people attacked you? and do you think they might?
Also guy on drugs ok, I'm pretty sure 9 rounds will put him down.
Oh whats the point, you lot just chat on how you will evade the law IF it passes and what you will really do because 90% of you are just blowing hot air and in reality you will do nothing.
Three very popular rifles: The M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944 and for many years sold by the federal government to individuals involved in marksmanship competition), a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the SKS.
Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel.
Whereas the 1994 ban included a list of approximately 600 rifles and shotguns exempted from the ban by name, the new bill’s list is increased to nearly 1,000 rifles and shotguns. Other than for the 11 detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles and one other semi-automatic rifle included in the list, however, the list appears to be pointless, because a separate provision of the bill exempts “any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.”
Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.
Originally posted by charlyv
reply to post by samhouston1886
And you wonder why gun owners freak out when people like you try and destroy our rights?
How about my rights, and the rights of others including children? The right to live in a world that is a little bit safer, and not to be peppered with an automatic or semi-auto with a large clip, just because some idiot is having a bad day.
I am a gun owner. I was in the military. I have my experts in a .38 and .45, which are still extremely lethal weapons and are definitely all that you need in your house, to protect yourself and family in the spirit of the right to bear arms in this country if you choose to own them. When not at the shooting range, they are locked up and have trigger locks installed as well. How many of these weapons out there are protected like that? I will bet not many. It is called responsibility.
These new restrictions on assault grade weapons are a long time coming. It is not going to solve all of the problems, but it will make them harder to get, and will also make 'legal' guns harder to get as well, which is a good thing. There is absolutely no good reason for the general public to own an assault class weapon, period. I support 100% making them illegal to own and this legislation can not happen fast enough to satisfy me.
edit on 27-12-2012 by charlyv because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by kozmo
I disagree on one count - a bunch of "gun-happy idiots" ARE beating the US military... In Afghanistan.
I also disagree on another count - They ARE attempting to ban guns in the US. Are you not paying attention?
I looked at the proposal on the Senator's website. It says nothing about banning guns and states, very clearly, that it doesn't threaten the Second Amendment. So yes, I am paying attention and I still see nothing for people to start to panic about.
Originally posted by Valhall
reply to post by DerekJR321
And there in lies the problem. The person posting on this thread and trying to paint what will happen as some dramatic convergence of millions on Washington (I believe doing so with the intent of trying to render the idea of civil unrest in this matter a ludicrous notion) has not taken into account exactly what you have just posted.
It's called the bubba factor. (really, it is)
The day ONE person says "no, you won't take my guns" OR the day the authorities attempt to arrest what WAS a law-abiding citizen because an unconstitutional law has rendered his constitutional rights illegal will be the day it starts....and it will be his neighbors and friends...and their neighbors and friends.
We don't all live in over-populated ant-hill areas where you don't even know your neighbor. In rural America, the farmer down the road will not be allowed to be persecuted.
Watch and see.
A man gunned down Thursday on Chicago's west side marked what police say is the city's 500th homicide of the year. It's a dubious distinction that hasn't occurred since 2008, when the city ended the year with 512 murders.