It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Mixed feelings about this. One part of me says good...they really deserved it. But perhaps the wiser, saner part says that stooping to the same level and doing the same to them just seems wrong. Where would this end?
Maybe the ACLU or someone like that could take them to court for this violation and make their lives miserable. Then again, Gannett (or whoever it was ultimately responsible for publishing this information) could probably fight for decades in court and not even feel the pinch.
Originally posted by angrysniper
Hope she's enjoying a taste of her own medicine:
"Let’s turn the tables on the Journal and see how they like it!"
There's her phone number and address, as well as that of her CEO.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
You knew it was coming:
SOURCE
If you're a publisher, and you are going to be irresponsible for the sake of your politics, then you risk being held to your own standards.
edit on Thu Dec 27 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: Starting a New Thread?...Look Here FirstAboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sitesplease post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item, as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
Originally posted by ABNARTY
How did the original article in the Journal News ever make it out in the first place? Whomever gave the OK to go ahead with this had to have envisioned some sort of response. Where was their responsibility to their employees? Perhaps their zealousness blinded them to the reality outside their door.
Part of me says you reap what you sew (sow, ???) and let it be. Part of me is concerned with the escalation because any government responses will not be sane.
Originally posted by TheCanuckian
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
You knew it was coming:
SOURCE
If you're a publisher, and you are going to be irresponsible for the sake of your politics, then you risk being held to your own standards.
edit on Thu Dec 27 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: Starting a New Thread?...Look Here FirstAboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sitesplease post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item, as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
So you were outraged by gun owners having their information posted? Then you deem it ok if the other side does it in return?
Either you act and live up to the standards you set or your a hypocrite.
Turnabout in this instances is not fair play, you basically tossed your convictions aside and lowered yourself to their level.
Congratulations to the guy who sunk down to their level, now you're just like them.
Anything driven by your anger and vengeance is wrong no matter how you decide to explain it away. It only leads to further negative reactions.
Is this how you gun owners want to run this debate? Tit for tat? Or do you want to show the world your mature enough to own those guns and live to a higher standard?
So far you only prove to me gun owners are whiny babies who need their guns taken away. God forbid we make them too angry and they go on a vengeance spree with their guns...edit on 28-12-2012 by TheCanuckian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheCanuckian
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
You knew it was coming:
SOURCE
If you're a publisher, and you are going to be irresponsible for the sake of your politics, then you risk being held to your own standards.
edit on Thu Dec 27 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: Starting a New Thread?...Look Here FirstAboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sitesplease post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item, as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
So you were outraged by gun owners having their information posted? Then you deem it ok if the other side does it in return?
Either you act and live up to the standards you set or your a hypocrite.
Turnabout in this instances is not fair play, you basically tossed your convictions aside and lowered yourself to their level.
Congratulations to the guy who sunk down to their level, now you're just like them.
Anything driven by your anger and vengeance is wrong no matter how you decide to explain it away. It only leads to further negative reactions.
Is this how you gun owners want to run this debate? Tit for tat? Or do you want to show the world your mature enough to own those guns and live to a higher standard?
So far you only prove to me gun owners are whiny babies who need their guns taken away. God forbid we make them too angry and they go on a vengeance spree with their guns...edit on 28-12-2012 by TheCanuckian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Mixed feelings about this. One part of me says good...they really deserved it. But perhaps the wiser, saner part says that stooping to the same level and doing the same to them just seems wrong. Where would this end?
Maybe the ACLU or someone like that could take them to court for this violation and make their lives miserable. Then again, Gannett (or whoever it was ultimately responsible for publishing this information) could probably fight for decades in court and not even feel the pinch.
Take them to court for what violation?
It's not illegal to publish names and addresses.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
what an utter FOOL that would write an article and let all the criminals in america know what houses that have guns so they can avoid them and rob the unarmed people.
kudos to this blogger.