It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EvanB
My issue with your statement is that it defies nature.. The very conditioning of society to downgrade mens roles and make him less aggressive and more pliable has created that mindset..
Originally posted by EvanBBut we are soo much more! We are built to exceed ourselves if only we would believe it!
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
Originally posted by Logarock
I do find this painting or whatever very intriguing.
I think that represents an angle that she knows there's some things only she can do, she learnt from her brothers and sisters to be what ever she needs to be (on her own, with family, and on the fly), and when she needs to do it and to be it.
Don't wait for Romeo sister, get in there and fix it if it's fracked, kind of stuff. Personal interpretation only of course.
Originally posted by closerseemsfurther
reply to post by EvanB
You should give credit to the author that wrote that in his book "Wild at Heart". Just saying... it kinda seems like you want people to believe those profound words came from you when the truth is, you're just reading a really good book.
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by EvanB
My issue with your statement is that it defies nature.. The very conditioning of society to downgrade mens roles and make him less aggressive and more pliable has created that mindset..
Im not sure how you can come to the conclusion that the only objective way to identify who is a man, and who is not. ie, through chromosomes, is unnatural. Isnt that the MOST natural way to define who is a man, and who isnt?
Also, have you considered that perhaps it is not mens absolute roles that are "diminishing", but womens relative roles within society increasing in importance, thus narrowing the relative gap between the sexes, giving rise to the idea that men are somehow under attack?
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by smithjustinb
It takes as much courage to admit when you are wrong as it does to duke someone out..
Originally posted by Raelsatu
Originally posted by Logarock
You have a very negative understanding of masculinity in men. Have you had some bad run with an "alpha male" or something. After reading youre last two post I would say you get youre back up if you are anywhere near a "man".
First off, your last sentence doesn't make much sense. Are you telling me to get back-up if I'm near a man?....
Anyway, you misunderstood my post. If anything I was pointing out that balance is key. Meaning that you can have masculine men who are idiots, or very intelligent. Same for not-so-masculine guys. Whether or not they're exceptionally masculine doesn't matter so much as who they are as a whole. I respect masculinity when paired with other positive attributes --- i.e intelligence, good judgement, logic, self-control, etc. Likewise if a guy was not so masculine but contained those same positive attributes, I would respect him the same. See what I'm getting at??
Judging by the grammar in your post I'm not surprised you didn't understand.
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by CaticusMaximus
Of course I know courageous women! Look at those amazing teachers in CT who gave their lives to protect those kids.. In my eyes THAT is a REAL woman.. Or the women who hold down jobs, keep a roof over their kids heads and food in their stomaches because their man was not man enough.. I LOVE womens strength! In many ways their strength exceeds that of a man..
Originally posted by DoYouEvenLift
This is all silliness.
Is there any research to back any of this up? Of course there isn't.
The definition of what a "man" is differs from culture to culture, ergo it is all social construct. You were trained form a young age to think the way you do about what being "manly" means. Why is it that your definition is any more correct than the definition of someone in Mongolia, Jordan, Congo, Brazil, or Norway?
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by DoYouEvenLift
This is all silliness.
Is there any research to back any of this up? Of course there isn't.
The definition of what a "man" is differs from culture to culture, ergo it is all social construct. You were trained form a young age to think the way you do about what being "manly" means. Why is it that your definition is any more correct than the definition of someone in Mongolia, Jordan, Congo, Brazil, or Norway?
Spoken like a true 21st century wussy boy needing academic research to validate where he stands in life.
How do you know there isn't research?
There has been lots of research on male-female attraction. Women are attracted to alpha males. It's their best evolutionary advantage.
Wussy boys from centuries ago would have never passed down their DNA.
Here's my personal experience. Act like a wussy boy and women will want to be friends. Act like an alpha male and women will be chasing you, following yo around the world, wanting you to pick them to have sex with.
Attraction is not a choice.
Spoon boy: Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Spoon boy: There is no spoon.
Neo: There is no spoon?
Spoon boy: Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.
Originally posted by Logarock
"get your back up" its a colloquialism. It has to do with the way the hair on a dogs back stands up when they get defencive.
Your last sentence.