It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree that protection of the children is called for, but not growing the police state. This is where the 2nd Amendment comes in.
Texas had the right idea: Arm the damn teachers....
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
I agree that protection of the children is called for, but not growing the police state. This is where the 2nd Amendment comes in.
Texas had the right idea: Arm the damn teachers....
edit on 12/25/2012 by Ex_CT2 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by forgetmenot
reply to post by hawkiye
It's poor form to accuse someone who has just been through a tragedy like this of shedding fake tears. You have absolutely zero proof of such nonsense. Plenty of people have cried over this and not just the victims families. Accusing any of hem of faking it amounts to little more than intellectual dishonesty.
edit on 25-12-2012 by forgetmenot because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by forgetmenot
reply to post by hawkiye
It's poor form to accuse someone who has just been through a tragedy like this of shedding fake tears. You have absolutely zero proof of such nonsense. Plenty of people have cried over this and not just the victims families. Accusing any of hem of faking it amounts to little more than intellectual dishonesty.
edit on 25-12-2012 by forgetmenot because: (no reason given)
I did not accuse anyone who has been through the tragedy of shedding fake tears. I was referring to Obama and his pretended crying. If you will note in context I was speaking of the elites when I mentioned fake tears. It is a fact and on video that he had no tears and was pretending to wipe tears that were not there. But nice try at trying to derail the discussion.
edit on 25-12-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by oper8zhin
But yet Obama and all of the other politicians who are against the idea of armed school guards HAPPILY ACCEPT THEIR CHILDREN'S SCHOOLS having armed guards for THEIR CHILDREN'S PROTECTION!!!!!!!!!!!
But when it is asked to have armed guards placed in schools to protect OUR CHILDREN, it is REJECTED.
WOW!!! Folks, do you see the EXTREME HYPOCRISY and ABSURDITY HERE??
For the CHILDREN of We The People[color=skyblue] of America, armed guards to assure OUR children's safety is REJECTED. Yet, for the [color=limegreen]anti-gun TRAITOR politicians of America, armed guards is FULLY ACCEPTED, EMBRACED, and a GOOD idea in THEIR children's schools.
THAT is OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!!!
edit on 25-12-2012 by oper8zhin because: (no reason given)
you do realize that for the first 100 or so years of this country, NO such protection detail existed, right ? at least not that which was provided and paid for by public tax dollars.
And the presidents , politicians and their family have always been guarded
While arming each other - civilians and criminals will NEVER get the crime rate down,
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
So apparently Several schools were given grants by the DOJ as part of a community policing development program but it got cancelled in 2005...
Obama was elected in 2008. Didn't take office until January 2009. But feel free to blame him cancelling a program in 2005.
Originally posted by papazen
reply to post by oper8zhin
I dont get it. People that fear the NWO and police state etc. now want armed guards patrolling public schools ?. Then its gonna be The librarys , public transit, parks, church's the pizza parlour. Its gonna look like the colony from the Total Recall movie. And the presidents , politicians and their family have always been guarded , they are usually more of a target then the average citizen . nothing new here . The terrorists keep on winning, They won 911 and tossed freedom and constitutional rights down the drain and now you are all treated like cattle at airports. Now the terrorist wins again and watches you all live in fear