It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
They will do exactly what they want to do to achieve their aims.
And what do you perceive their aims to be?
Originally posted by almadd2012
Originally posted by Unity_99
Why couldn't you have something the size of a garden shed, with a tank of water, and use a little portion of energy to suck the water up, and then release the force down, and turning a series of wheels, so you have both the kinetic energy and produce more. I thought it would work easily, in fact recall some ingenius ways, that they seemed to bring water uphill in the past, so you could have a pretty small energy imprint in using energy, and release quite a bit more.
The answer is simple: the amount of energy required to "suck the water up" is not "a little portion", as you state. It is, in fact, no less than the entire energy of the water going down. Since some energy is always lost in the process, you can't even keep your little fountain running, let alone pull energy from it to do other work.
And no, not willing to buy it, the bubbler already creates it, just need the motor built to utilize this properly.
A fallacy out there is that it takes more energy to produce the HHO than the energy it releases. Not at all true, that's why there are HHO generators available out there. You can produce HHO with as little as 1.5 volts DC and an amp of current. It's not only how it's done but the way in which the HHO generator is configured to permit a useful out put with minimal power input. You can put 2 bare ended wires into a bucket of water with an electrolyte and produce a small quantity of HHO by putting a DC current through the wires. The principle is to produce as much HHO as possible with the least amount of electrical energy and generated exothermic heat. In reality, once the HHO generator has been charged up it actually acts like a wet cell battery. It holds a charge of 1.5 - 2.0 volts DC and can operate when charged with the power switch turned off, until the remaining suspended HHO gas is pulled off and the cell ultimately discharges. The power switch is primarily used to maintain the HHO generators charge.
What we do here is draw off that produced gaseous material by vacuum created by the vehicles engine and feed the gasses directly into the engine for combustion purposes. The system is an on demand system, "NOT" a pressurized storage system the HHO generator only produces what the vehicles engine may call for, nothing more.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by Unity_99
And no, not willing to buy it, the bubbler already creates it, just need the motor built to utilize this properly.
As with all free energy devices. Just need one more thing . . . .
It's amazing how when real scientists get near a perpetual motion device something breaks moments before.
Originally posted by Unity_99
By the way, John Bedini had some problems when replicating John Hutchinson's crystal batteries.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Mary Rose
If you don't think free energy is possible then you're not willing to engage my hypothetical. End of discussion.
As I and several others have explained, if free energy were possible, huge corporations would exploit it for limitless profit. Can you think of any reason why they would not?
This showed more volts out than in, and is too noisy, and a high rpm apparently.