It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Let's retrace our steps.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
No. I'm not interested in running around in circles and going on wild goose chases on a forum.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
You should listen to the Steven Greer interview.
Originally posted by Phage
Unless someone finally comes up with a unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics it's not going to get much better.
Spontaneous energy generation and over-unity energy production is permissible in subquantum kinetics because in this novel paradigm the physical universe is viewed as an open system, one capable of evolving to a state of greater energy content and increased order. Conventional physics, by comparison, views the physical universe as a closed-system, one that was created 13.8 billion years ago through some inexplicable anomaly and which has existed ever since cooling off toward a heat death. More can be learned about the open system conceptualization offered by subquantum kinetics by clicking Portal Alpha below, or by reading about subquantum kinetics (see available physics paper downloads).
Originally posted by Mary Rose
One possibility is to consider Paul LaViolette’s Subquantum Kinetics.
A pulselike wave that can exist in nonlinear systems, does not obey the superposition principle, and does not disperse.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Thank you, God, for the movers and shakers of this world.
Not once in his whole tale does he address the fact that the U.T. School of Law HAS ABSOLUTELY NO RECORDS OF HIM EVER ATTENDING! Instead, consistant with the symptoms of a pathological liar, he talks about how so many famous people knew him and liked him, and goes on constantly bragging about his "intelligence." Similar to all his other fantasies, he claims that there was an entire event where prestigious teachers tried to convince him to "come back" to law school - as if he were that important. He even claims the Governor of Texas got involved! LOL!!!!
How dumb does Lyne think his victims are? Well, unfortunately for him, there is no getting out of it this time; he has shown his true colors. Why does he lie like this? I think he wants people to think he is the greatest thing happening, and so he acts as if he knows every famous person and has been involved in every major recent historical event. Definitely a lying disorder...
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Thank you, God, for the movers and shakers of this world.
. . . Mr. Hotson, however, always intended a career in physics. Unfortunately, he could not resist asking awkward questions. His professors taught that conservation of mass-energy is the never-violated, rock-solid foundation of all physics. In “pair production” a photon of at least 1.022 MeV “creates” an electron-positron pair, each with 0.511 MeV of rest energy, with any excess being the momentum of the “created” pair. So supposedly the conservation books balance.
But the “created” electron and positron both have spin (angular momentum) energy of h/4p. By any assumption as to the size of electron or positron, this is far more energy than that supplied by the photon at “creation.”
“Isn’t angular momentum energy?” he asked a professor.
“Of course it is. This half-integer spin angular momentum is the energy needed by the electron to set up a stable standing wave around the proton. Thus it is responsible for the Pauli exclusion principle, hence for the extension and stability of all matter. You could say it is the sole cause of the periodic table of elements.”
“Then where does all this energy come from? How can the ‘created’ electron have something like sixteen times more energy than the photon that supposedly ‘created’ it? Isn’t this a huge violation of your never-violated rock-solid foundation of all physics?”
“We regard spin angular momentum as an ‘inherent property’ of electron and positron, not as a violation of conservation.”
“But if it’s real energy, where does it come from? Does the Energy Fairy step in and proclaim a miracle every time ‘creation’ is invoked, billions of times a second? How does this fit your never-violated conservation?”
“‘Inherent property’ means we don’t talk about it, and you won’t either if you want to pass this course.” . . .