posted on Dec, 24 2012 @ 10:52 PM
To clarify, it is a buzzword futurologists, sociologists, historians, philosophers, etc. all use to describe the same eventuality. This eventuality is
the loss of personal liberty in exchange for security, the police state, and every other example/function of dystopian society.
This eventuality is not being orchestrated by a shadowy group of string pullers. It is being perpetuated by the desires of the masses. They want--no,
demand--safety, and are willing to give up their liberty and freedom to have it. In other words, we (or rather, "the masses") are, for all intents
and purposes, the NWO and we don't even know it.
Take for example the latest round of gun violence in Connecticut.
Was this an "inside job" and/or a deliberate act involving MKULTRA, etc.? It very well could be, of course.
But I think the more probable explanation is a deranged man who slipped through the system. He had no ulterior motives, and instead was just severely
mentally ill. People's reaction to the event (ban all guns, repeal the Second Amendment, etc.) is all very natural. I don't think masses of people
are being manipulated by that shadowy organization, just as I don't believe the perpetrator was some mind-controlled robot.
Or what about the CCTV system in the UK?
Those from that country wanted nothing to do with being the victims of crime, and decided to allow for the installation of 24/7 video monitoring. Has
it helped to diminish random acts of crime or violence? Maybe--I personally couldn't say. What it DEFINITELY has done, without a doubt, is remove
liberty and freedom from the citizens of the UK.
If you are being watched, or if there is a chance you are being watched, you are safe, perhaps, but you lack personal liberty. There are no "if"s,
"and"s or "but"s about it.
Or what about the joke of an airport security system in the US, and the woefully under-trained "agents" the TSA employs?
That isn't the direct result of Osama's attack on NYC, and it wasn't the end result of some grandiose scheme by our own Government. That was the
direct result of the masses again trading liberty for security. They wanted to feel safe post 9/11, and they don't care about who did it, or why. All
they care about is making it to their destination alive, no matter the cost. And now, they are realizing their folly.
There are plenty of other examples of the police/surveillance state.
I leave you with this question: if the removal of personal liberty is the ultimate goals of this so called NWO shadow organization, and the masses
blindly get themselves into these situations as described above, wouldn't or couldn't one say that the masses themselves are the actual NWO?
In every case, the masses have reacted in a way that brings about new laws and legislation. In every case, the most probable explanation is that they
are manipulating themselves, based on their own collective fear. Thus, the creation of an organized group (aka "The NWO"), boils down to the masses
shifting "blame" away from themselves, as some sort of coping mechanism.
Of course, if you allow for the improbable, there very much well could be a group of men, pulling the strings of society. But taking a step back,
thinking about things from a sociological standpoint, taking into consideration the collective stupidity of the masses, the alternative (i.e. my
interpretation) is much more probable explanation of our descent into a world without liberty.