It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by greyer
Do you believe there were images blurred out on the moon?
Originally posted by ArMaP
I must say that I have seen thousands of photos of the Moon, from several missions, and I have never seen a blurred out photo.
I have seen some blurred out, some low quality, some clearly altered photos, but almost all were on private sites, most of them sites that say NASA alters the photos.
Originally posted by ausername
Some people need to believe in Aliens and UFOs just like others need to believe in God.
Both offer some small amount of proof, and both require faith, and a willingness to believe.
One is real, and the other fantasy. Which is a matter of perspective,
Both offer you the existence of superior beings with capabilities beyond anything in our human world. Neither have been proven to exist.
My theory?
We have been visited, from the future, our own future, not by aliens from other worlds.
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
...
Do you have faith in a President who admits he belongs to a secret society, yet is unwilling to provide any information of his purpose or activity there?
ausername, what you are stating is an obsolete paradigm of “we cannot do anything other than believe what we are told”. In the age of Wikipedia and YouTube, ignorance is choice.
How? You get basic facts, e.g. on 9/11 buildings collapsed, then you study what makes a building collapse. Or e.g. in Baalbek are rocks that weigh 1000 tons, then you study what is required to quarry and properly place them. Make your own conclusion, your own theory, do not believe anybody who has a vested interest.
Give me basic facts that I can verify independently, and then logic conclusion that lead you to your theory. If you do not want to do the homework, it is your choice.
Originally posted by FormerSkeptic
Would you care to go out on a limb and state your "beliefs" — your "Current Intellectual Understanding of Extraterrestrials" ?
Originally posted by greyer
Hey, believe it or not I have seen the supposed brushed out photos before they were brushed out. Early when they first came out on youtube, I don't know how it was there but I saw the same photos without the blurr on them.
Originally posted by FormerSkeptic
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
...
Do you have faith in a President who admits he belongs to a secret society, yet is unwilling to provide any information of his purpose or activity there?
[ also curious about which president you're talking about ]
Absence of evidence of course, can never be mistaken by logical and intelligent beings as evidence of absence.
Originally posted by Harte
I find the above to be poorly thought out and exhibiting a sort of mental laziness that is quite common.
That is, is there any such thing as "evidence of absence?" If not, then why do teachers still take roll? If so, then how can absence of evidence not constitute evidence of absence?
You know, Sagan was being overtly sarcastic when he coined the phrase.
Harteedit on 12/29/2012 by Harte because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ManInAsia
reply to post by ThinkingHuman
Don't take this as a personal attack.
First understand the origin of the word 'nonsense'. It comes from 'non' and 'sense'.
Does believing the world came into existence 5,000 years ago make any logical sense, when all evidence points otherwise?
Does believing that aliens interfered with the human genome make any logical sense, when there is no evidence at all supporting this supposition. What exactly did they interfere with? Which part? Why? When? What's even the point of this theory? What evidence exists for this?
As for my use of the word 'lady luck' I suggest you look up the neutral theory of evolution. Or you can simply look at massive extinction events during the history of the effort and explain to me how 90% plus of creatures were not unlucky to go extinct at the end of the Permian .
dsc.discovery.com... - Lady Unlucky perhaps?
As I said a bit of learning and book reading goes a long way.
edit on 31-12-2012 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 31-12-2012 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)edit on 31-12-2012 by ManInAsia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TrueBrit
Absence of evidence of course, can never be mistaken by logical and intelligent beings as evidence of absence.
Originally posted by Harte
I find the above to be poorly thought out and exhibiting a sort of mental laziness that is quite common.
That is, is there any such thing as "evidence of absence?" If not, then why do teachers still take roll? If so, then how can absence of evidence not constitute evidence of absence?
You know, Sagan was being overtly sarcastic when he coined the phrase.
Harteedit on 12/29/2012 by Harte because: (no reason given)
Well, to follow on from your roll call analogy, if a teacher calls the roll, and a pupil is missing from the class room, that does not mean that they are not in school. It just means that at the time of the call, the pupil was unavailable to vouch for his or her presence. They could have been in the toilet, or in the nurses office after skinning a knee on the steps on the way in. They are in school, but not in the class room, meaning that for the purposes of a roll call (those being to ascertain the presence of pupils so that in the event of fire, or other disasters, the school can account for all persons on the premises) they are absent, but are physically present none the less.
Originally posted by TrueBritThe same could be said of possible alien intelligences. Just because we have no evidence for thier existence, or presence if you will, does not mean that they do not exist, and are not present. They have merely failed thus far to shout "Here" when called.