It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by hypattia
Don't link me to youtube vids either, that's not proof. Nope her actual fb page, or a news article. Surely she spoke to the media? If for no other reason than to correct the error.
Nope, I smell something fishy about her allegations and from what I can tell from her online presence, it seems to be more about promoting her handcraft business....sad, sad, sad...
Originally posted by hattie
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by hattie
Why does it matter what her husband was called? How does her husband's name, or even what he looks like have anything to do with the shootings?
It's just more, totally unwarranted and unnecessary intrusion into a grieving person's life. I really, really don't know why you haven't taken this message on board, it's quite simple
Unless her husband is frequenting these message boards, then I highly doubt I'm intruding into his grief.
I'm discussing inconsistencies in the story. You are free to not discuss them.
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
It would be better to ignore it? I'm down with that, however if *someone* decides to politicize it with prejudice, it would be much harder to backtrack and try to convince people it was a put on.
Originally posted by hattie
Originally posted by hattie
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by hattie
Why does it matter what her husband was called? How does her husband's name, or even what he looks like have anything to do with the shootings?
It's just more, totally unwarranted and unnecessary intrusion into a grieving person's life. I really, really don't know why you haven't taken this message on board, it's quite simple
Unless her husband is frequenting these message boards, then I highly doubt I'm intruding into his grief.
I'm discussing inconsistencies in the story. You are free to not discuss them.
You know what? Today while I was in church, I was deeply saddened by the thought that none of the parents shown in the videos is grieving for their children. And I cried. I haven't seen proof of grief from anyone in the videos. How can it be that ALL of the interviewed people who lost someone can get through an interview without shedding a single tear??? I can't even THINK about losing a child of my own without tearing up. So, to quote myself above, "I highly doubt I'm intruding into his grief" because I highly doubt there is any grief.
I am heartsick about all of this. And THAT is why I need true answers.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
It would be better to ignore it? I'm down with that, however if *someone* decides to politicize it with prejudice, it would be much harder to backtrack and try to convince people it was a put on.
Convince people?
How is that working out for you? How has it worked out in the past for you?
Madness is repeating the same steps, and expecting different results.
No, i stopped trying to convince people of stuff. The truth is there, obvious for others to see. And they do see it. In their own personal way. One thing is always true: their truth, and your truth....two different things.
Originally posted by hattie
Originally posted by hattie
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by hattie
Why does it matter what her husband was called? How does her husband's name, or even what he looks like have anything to do with the shootings?
It's just more, totally unwarranted and unnecessary intrusion into a grieving person's life. I really, really don't know why you haven't taken this message on board, it's quite simple
Unless her husband is frequenting these message boards, then I highly doubt I'm intruding into his grief.
I'm discussing inconsistencies in the story. You are free to not discuss them.
You know what? Today while I was in church, I was deeply saddened by the thought that none of the parents shown in the videos is grieving for their children. And I cried. I haven't seen proof of grief from anyone in the videos. How can it be that ALL of the interviewed people who lost someone can get through an interview without shedding a single tear??? I can't even THINK about losing a child of my own without tearing up. So, to quote myself above, "I highly doubt I'm intruding into his grief" because I highly doubt there is any grief.
I am heartsick about all of this. And THAT is why I need true answers.
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by sconner755
I wholeheartedly disapprove...edit on 6-1-2013 by Pilot because: never you mind
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by sconner755
I wholeheartedly disapprove...edit on 6-1-2013 by Pilot because: never you mind
Tell me why anybody should care about your approval or disapproval?
On, topic, this thread is about debunked theories. The "no grieving," "this was a drill," and "the parents were actors," theories have been debunked.
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
reply to post by Pilot
When I was shown someone I knew to be a parent it disproved his point. Dry eyes.
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
reply to post by Pilot
When I was shown someone I knew to be a parent it disproved his point. Dry eyes.
So this is the new standard for proving a conspiracy?
Somebody whose child was shot has dry eyes in photo? Do you think every person cries non-stop? Would you expect every photo to capture every moment of crying? Please try to answer logically.
The assertion was made that there were no photos of people grieving, and that the entire incident was a drill. Clearly there are photos of parents, friends, and family members grieving, both the day of the event, and at the funerals.
Are you still trying to argue the parents are actors, or part of a conspiracy?
Originally posted by peashooter
Sconner you need to relax. It just shows there are many people out there that do not feel "right" when they see this report including the people interviewed. It seems like we are letting our emotions control our basic judgment here. No one answered my question regarding Gene Rosen and his rehearsal tape? What about that sconner? Is he a dumbass attacking people who's kids are murdered? I sure wouldn't want to see a rehearsal vid of a jackass talking about the event like it's a joke.edit on 6-1-2013 by peashooter because: (no reason given)
www.youtube.com...edit on 6-1-2013 by peashooter because: youtube link