TO MODS: NO PERSONAL INFORMATION IN BELOW POST HAS BEEN GIVEN
So after seeing the article clearing R from any of this, but with seeing the contradictory statement that someone on here noticed in the article (R
stated he was parked
, police mentioned he remembered pulling
him over) and then seeing that Greenwich is where this was supposed to take
place at, but we have been listening to Fairfield and Newtown radios, I was almost back to square one in my head on this.
I went back and listened to the Fairfield audio myself, near where they stated R's name and I think I am at peace with this now. But please confirm
and help solidify this (school starts back up next week and I need closure
The videos with with the audio from the radio have been listed several times by two other members here - so if you have been following you know where
to go, if not you can easily search via title names below.
Fairfeild 12-14-2012 9_34 to 10_0 Audio Recording
: Sounds like a report of an accident near or at the "Liberty Way Parking Lot"
I did a search for liberty way parking lot + CT and found the below link:
If we are talking about the same parking lot (maybe there is one closer to the shooting also???) then this shows that we are also getting radio
reports from Greenwich on the Fairfield radio. This is important now because the article that clears R states that he received the warning in
Greenwich. So it is possible that we are in fact hearing Greenwich chatter on the Fairfield radio.
: Mentions 'same location' and then asks for tags 5xx-xxx to be run (not listing full plates and do not do so if you end up listening
and posting more details). I can't tell if this is the same voice as the 20:23 and I don't know who is the dispatch vs the patrol voices.
In the report that cleared R, he stated he was driving a Nissan. Well the plates starting with 5xx-xxx show a Nissan
show registered in Norwalk which is close to where R was shown to live. This does not prove this is his car because I am not doing any title searches
- this is just a generic search for public information that does not show names or addresses, but does show car type.
Fairfeild 12-14-2012 10_04 to 10_34 Audio Recording (2nd recording)
Time 1:55 - 2:26
: Asking for R's name to be run, listed as the operator (voice sounds similar to one of the recordings above, maybe both)
Ok so this is about 11 minutes later after this initial request for plates beginning with 5xx-xxx to be run and now they are asking for the 'operator'
to be run also. This is also just about 30 seconds after the plates beginning with 8xx-xxx were asked to be run (that time is at 1:35 in this same
While hearing the 8xx-xxx and then immediately R's name come next, it is easy to put the two together. It has been stated in past posts that they may
have been unrelated and due to a traffic stop - but nothing was proven one way or the other. I did find where 8xx-xxx was listed as being registered
in Sandy Hook which was close to where L lived, but the radio recording seemed to have more weight than the registration - I still kept my opinion on
the fence at least. Note that I don't remember anyone ever posting about the 5xx-xxx plates otherwise I would have done some digging there (unless I
missed a post about it). There were plates starting with 7xx-xxx that were brought up and that was a Porche, but not plates with 5xx-xxx.
I think with the article clearing R and then with the above details, this one can be put to rest as debunked (at least for me). I admit it is not 100%
as I can find holes in it still, but what we have in summary is:
-a request for 5xx-xxx
-later a request for 8xx-xxx (which is registered in Sandy Hook)
-a request for R's name to be run
-proof that we were hearing Greenwich radio traffic on the Fairfield recordings
-proof that 5xx-xxx is a Nissan (as the article is stating) registered in Norwalk
Without title searches, it is still circumstantial no matter what side of the fence you are on in regards to the plates. But with now hearing the
5xx-xxx and seeing it is a Nissan and with Greenwich radio chatter and now the article, I am on the side that the 8xx-xxx belonged to the L family and
that this 5xx-xxx belongs to R now. Closure
EDIT TO ADD: Remember NOT to post full plates or R's name in regards to this. Thanks!
EDIT ALSO TO ADD: There is still the issue of the back plates of the Honda possibly being different than the front plates...I just remember this
If anyone finds a higher res of the rear plate and can clarify one way or the other, please u2u me link, I think I am going to remove it from my head
though for now, as the temporary closure I just had felt good lol.
edit on 4-1-2013 by ratboy because: spelling
edit on 4-1-2013 by ratboy because: 'to adds'
edit on 4-1-2013 by
Asktheanimals because: edit to remain t&c friendly