A list of already debunked theories, re: Sandy hook, page 61


Pages: <<  58    59    60    61    62    63    64  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 54 times


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 12:06 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by destination now
reply to
post by CinnamonHearts



And I can't believe you can't answer a simple question. No where did I say "stop talking about it" I just asked a question. Do you have answers to my questions?

Dont you know? When they are faced with logic, they turn to accusations of "shutting down the conversation". Really, its happened all throughout this thread, and others. Its almost out of a playbook.


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 12:44 PM by vkey08
reply to post by hattie



Hm.. I wonder why that's there.. Instead of wild speculation and conspiracies, why not think of it more along the lines of police responding and ordering any officer to shoot to kill.. suspect that's heavily armed, already killed numerous people, and they didn't think they could take him down peacefully..

Hmm novel concept.... but then again, noone ever thinks of those things, just how it's got to be a hypnotic suggestion in a grand conspiracy...



reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 12:52 PM by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by hattie



Hattie just a correction.......I posted the recordings to youtube all separated as they are at that website. That phrase is ONLY on the Newtown police recording.......it is NOT on the Fairfield recording. It was said it was recorded......the only questions now are who said that and why?


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 01:06 PM by SMOKINGGUN2012
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
reply to
post by DelMarvel


Be that as it may, it actually muddies the water even more to try to reconcile how a random traffic stop in Greenwich, CT managed to get on a Newtown police channel frequency.


Correction it was NOT on the Newtown recording only the Fairfield County recording so it was either County or State police. What is a County or State Detective, remember the article states Detective, doing with a random traffic stop to issue a verbal warning of a parking violation? IMO TOTALLY FICTITIOUS TO PROVIDE AN ALIBI. The next question is why?


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 01:25 PM by vkey08
reply to post by SMOKINGGUN2012



Shows how much you know about Connecticut....and the structure of police here..

There are no County Police/Sheriff's in Connecticut at all, they were done away with quite a few years ago to save money.. (in 2000 then Governor Rowland did away with the Sheriff's system after a huge scandal)

Some towns have Resident Troopers instead of regular police departments, so unless the stop was on the Merritt Parkway or I95 (or even 84 if up near Danbury which would be odd if it were Fairfield) A local police officer would have been the one making the stop.

Also CT State Police Detectives have the same authority as any other officer to make traffic stops, issue citations, and cite verbally a warning if they see an incident, it is not uncommon up here to see the State Police (numerous different ranks) making stops in towns if they see something that warrants it. We never see anything unusual, in fact the detectives and troopers drive the same vehicles, unmarked Crown Vic's or Chargers with only the lightbar to designate them.. even the license plates are regular issue plates and make no reference to being official or in any way law enforcement.


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 01:50 PM by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by vkey08



Oh did not know that but thanks for the correction. I meant to point out it was NOT Newtown as it was not on that recording. I thought this:

BCD996XT scanning CSP Troop G, Darien PD, New Canaan PD, and Greenwich PD.


Which is the description of what is recorded for the Fairfield County feed at Radioreference, included county police. It does appear to include Troop G of the state police and Greenwich PD where he claims to have been pulled over. I have never heard of a Detective pulling someone over at all let alone for a minor parking warning. Seems way, way, way, way, to convenient for me. So at the exact time of this shooting he just happens to have an alibi by none other than the police? What are the odds of that?


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 02:45 PM by vkey08
reply to post by SMOKINGGUN2012



well that explains a lot actually, Greenwich..

That PD would pull over you just to pull a power trip on ya, even if it was just for a warning, just to show they are so much better than everyone else, so yeah a detective there WOULD pull over someone if they looked at them even cross-eyed just to prove a point..

I've gotten many a warning and ticket in that town...


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:19 PM by VimanaExplorer
I think I will post it here, since this where we discuss theories , I hope it is not a out of topic post.

Marlow posted this link in another thread , which is giving even more questions than answers.

Shooter's motives



Lanza — a string bean-thin goth kid described by friends as a “genius” — first shot his mother then drove to the school in her car with at least three of her guns: a Glock and a SIG Sauer, and a .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle. And the gunman had access to even more guns than the trio found at the school — cops recovered a .45-caliber Henry repeating rifle, a .22-caliber Marlin rifle, and a .30-caliber Enfield rifle, a law enforcement source told CNN.

After shooting his way into the building, Lanza, dressed in black and wearing a bullet-proof vest — opened fire in two classrooms at around 9:30 am.


Several questions on that.

* Motivation of targeting this particular school is an altercation with the teachers. Still not sure the connection to this school or teachers.
* MSM is famous for character assassination , now calling him as 'genius'
* He had bullet-proof vest - Is it owned by Nancy as well or aquired by him /given to him by someone
* Initially we were told all the guns were owned by Nancy, but now they are listing several more - cops recovered a .45-caliber Henry repeating rifle, a .22-caliber Marlin rifle, and a .30-caliber Enfield rifle,


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:25 PM by vkey08
reply to post by VimanaExplorer



This is the only part of this that I don't agree with what they are saying on, There is no way, humanly possible Adam, himself, could have carried this off. I don't think the dude the other thread was talking about had diddly to do with it, but I do think Adam had gotten himself in with some other more.. "armed" individuals that helped him carry out this crime...

Do I have proof, no, it's just a strong hunch. A hunch that is supported by the fact that the entire state is still on a random traffic stop, school and public building lockdown type situation..



reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:29 PM by Marlow
reply to post by VimanaExplorer


That was an old story from December 15, 2012
I only posted it in order to show that you can not take the media stories as truth, because it was reported a few days later that there was no "altercation".


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:33 PM by VimanaExplorer
reply to post by Marlow



I see, still they are listing more guns and bullet-proof vest, I doubt Nancy owned any of those. So at this point, we can't trust take any MSM reports at its face value. So there will be more questions than answers.


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:55 PM by hattie
Originally posted by vkey08
reply to
post by hattie



Hm.. I wonder why that's there.. Instead of wild speculation and conspiracies, why not think of it more along the lines of police responding and ordering any officer to shoot to kill.. suspect that's heavily armed, already killed numerous people, and they didn't think they could take him down peacefully..

Hmm novel concept.... but then again, noone ever thinks of those things, just how it's got to be a hypnotic suggestion in a grand conspiracy...


Shoot to kill is fine. Using his correct name when they weren't even sure of his name is slightly concerning. Considering their first "official" thoughts were that his name was Ryan.

Hattie


reply posted on 4-1-2013 @ 03:56 PM by vkey08
reply to post by hattie



We don't know that they didn't know at that time, all we know is the MEDIA didn't know at that time, there's a huge huge difference...
Pages: <<  58    59    60    61    62    63    64  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags