LOL- My source is the SWAT calling "Clear" on the radio... And four hours latyer uniforms arrive on scene and are "surprised" to find a closet full of
people. Not going to dig up the scanner feed , time to hear "Building is clear" or the report of the people found hidden in a closet- But it is
The "conspiracy" would in fact be the "cover up" as they would be "conspiring" to cover something up-
Lets just take 1 point I mentioned - Swat calling clear and 4 hours later a group is found in a closet by uniforms... This is inexcusable. Totally.
While we are on this- These SWAT members endangered a ton of lives of both Police and citizens alike.
Lets take another point- Covering entry/egress points in a(n) (possible) ongoing crime such as this is pretty much job #1 everywhere- The entry points
into (in this case) the school must be immediately cleared and remain so to keep citizens (like Parents) from rushing in and to keep a clear route for
EMS to get to and from the scene since you will more than likely be facing injuries. This is basic stuff man, no major training required.
-Buddy, I could hit all these points but I am wasting my breath- You can excuse these as "mistakes" and "ill training" (which I actually agree with-
But that isnt the point...At all.
This entire thing looked like a cluster# from second #1.
And still no Subpoena as of Friday to get cellphone records to find which of the First Responders was leaking to the press with half truths(which is a
But again- A coverup would be a conspiracy and that is my theory. Your theory is "Yes, they made mistakes, didnt follow SOP ...But...Clearly they will
tell us about all the mistakes we made that we do not know about once the Official report is out."
I call BS. This bad of a response and I can almost guarantee there is a lot more we have no clue about... And they will (IMO) do their best to keep
this information from the public thus conspiring to cover something up...
I will be making a thread sometime detailing my theory and we can discuss it there...Here is talking about what constiturtes proper discussion , what
is allowed, etc. (although not the purpose of the thread it was derailed via a PM sent to me and everyone else linking us here)
edit on 25-12-2012 by DarKPenguiN because: clarity