It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sek82
reply to post by bknapple32
Bk, you're being silly. That is not expressionism or speaking freely, that is inciting Panic which is illegal.
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by RedBird
You dont have a human right to yell fire in a closed space.. nor do you have the legal right...
Originally posted by bknapple32
Nor do you have the right to verbally harass someone in your office because of free speech. You'll get fired and/or sued.
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by RedBird
But thats simply not true. You dont have a human right to yell fire in a closed space.. nor do you have the legal right...
Nor do you have the right to verbally harass someone in your office because of free speech. You'll get fired and/or sued.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Can you be banned from this site, and others? Then you don't have a right to free speech on here.
Can you provide any precedence that challenges the right of site owners to dictate what they wish to allow on their site?
Did you agree to the terms of service by creating your account on this site?
Nice try though.
The human right, sure...but that's talking morality. But legal right? I'm pretty sure you can yell FIRE anywhere you want so long as you aren't violating noise restrictions or trespassing or anything. I don't think it's illegal to yell SHARK at a beach either if there isn't one!
Originally posted by EffTheCIA
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by RedBird
You dont have a human right to yell fire in a closed space.. nor do you have the legal right...
The human right, sure...but that's talking morality. But legal right? I'm pretty sure you can yell FIRE anywhere you want so long as you aren't violating noise restrictions or trespassing or anything. I don't think it's illegal to yell SHARK at a beach either if there isn't one!
Originally posted by bknapple32
Nor do you have the right to verbally harass someone in your office because of free speech. You'll get fired and/or sued.
Now you're using the word "harass". That is an exception to the 1st amendment.
Sorry man. I wasn't intending on getting on that topic. I was merely pointing out that the MOTIVE of the crime was gun control. Then baconappled00d decided to say he didn't want to debate gun control, while proceeding to ask a question that was a blatant attempt to start a debate.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Claim 4) Emilie Parker appears in a picture with obama after her death.
Answer) No, she doesnt. There is NOTHING about that picture that proves that Emilie Parker is still alive. What is proven, is that her siblings look a lot like her, and we KNOW they have matching dresses. There is not one single bit of evidence to prove that that picture is Emilie Parker.
Same child. Same dress. No article mentions identical twin and no parent would dress an identical twin in the deceased child's outfit for the memorial.
You don't know mothers and parents then.
And you say no evidence.
I say, there is indeed a lot to question. And actors obviously were employed. I don't know who died and who was taken underground, but I believe that the so called young killer was Murdered By Black Ops as his mother, and who knows how many others died.
And yeah, the Batman movie, its for real.
You're dealing with Murder Incorporated AKA TPTB.
Originally posted by EffTheCIA
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Can you be banned from this site, and others? Then you don't have a right to free speech on here.
Can you provide any precedence that challenges the right of site owners to dictate what they wish to allow on their site?
Did you agree to the terms of service by creating your account on this site?
Nice try though.
Actually I've heard some cases that Terms of Services are entirely unenforceable because you're required to say Yes in order to use the product.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by EffTheCIA
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Can you be banned from this site, and others? Then you don't have a right to free speech on here.
Can you provide any precedence that challenges the right of site owners to dictate what they wish to allow on their site?
Did you agree to the terms of service by creating your account on this site?
Nice try though.
Actually I've heard some cases that Terms of Services are entirely unenforceable because you're required to say Yes in order to use the product.
"I've heard" ? Provide a legal example. Otherwise "I heard" you're wrong.
Originally posted by Argyll
Do you really think that if the government of the USA wanted to take it's citizens guns away from them it would have to kill 20 children?
Originally posted by Argyll
The citizens of the USA elected their government.....they don't need to kill kids to get your guns, if they want them they'll get them, but I don't think they do, I think in the light of another psycho there may be moves to control guns in the US.....and is that really a bad thing?.......do you really need AK-47's and the like to protect your homes?
Originally posted by bknapple32
More ignorance. It absolutely is illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater when there isnt one.
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
He is talking about EULA and is correct.
Sony was sued .
This would not fall under that as you could be kicked for any reason- But he is right, a EULA is not enforcable in a court of law.
Originally posted by EffTheCIA
Originally posted by bknapple32
More ignorance. It absolutely is illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater when there isnt one.
Would love to see the law on that.
Originally posted by EffTheCIA
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
He is talking about EULA and is correct.
Sony was sued .
This would not fall under that as you could be kicked for any reason- But he is right, a EULA is not enforcable in a court of law.
I do not see any difference with a Terms of Service on a message board. But that would be up to the Supreme Court to decide. As of yet, I don't think it has ruled on the matter.
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by EffTheCIA
You could have every gun on the planet and it wouldnt matter against the gov. They would just nuke you and be done with it. Or send in a tank and just blow you to smithereens.
Sorry. You are NEVER overthrowing the government unless those involved with military are on your side. In which case you still dont need those guns..
Either way. A gun will not overthrow the government. Ever.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Look it up yourself if you are that ignorant. Usually we provide links here. I didnt know I had to provide a link equivalent to proving its illegal to run a red light