It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RedBird
Originally posted by happykat39
The wildly foolish self-absorbed conjecture regarding the massacre in Newtown, CT has, in my opinion, thrown the quality of conversation on ATS all the way back to how horrible it was before we started our 6 years of hard work. Posting personal information of private citizens, then casting nasty aspersions on them, is the lowest of lows I've ever seen on this site for which I was once proud.
Those who have the urge to speculate on the minute oddities of the "story line" as is currently known should take fair warning that if the ethical quality of the discussion does not immediately improve, the staff will have no choice but to place a temporary hold on all discussions related to the massacre.
I beg your unbelievable pardon?
The 'ethical' quality of the discussion?
ATS is a web-site where any and all of the following topics are routinely open for discussion:
- Racial theories of intelligence
- Holocaust denial
- That some races may not be human
- The summary execution of individuals in positions of power
- Claims that some (NAMED!) individuals are not really human (Do reptilian aliens have human rights?)
- The violent overthrow of a perceived oppressive government
- Violence against law enforcement officials
- Advocating for voluntary human extinction
- Advocating for eugenics
- Anti-vaccine discussions
- Encouraging schizophrenics not to take their medication
All of that is A-OK.
You can say that the mass-murder of 6-million Jews never took place, and no one will bat an eye. But if you say that 20 children didn't really die two weeks ago, you've gone too far.
You can say that the Catholic Church or the Illuminati perform ritual child abuse and blood sacrifice, and no one will blink, but if you suggest that one individual appears "creepy" around children, you've gone too far.
You can say that George W Bush is really a blood-drinking reptilian alien who personally ordered the ritual murder of thousands of Iraqi children, but if you suggest that a private citizen may have been involved in the commission of a crime, you've gone too far.
Slander and libel are criminal offenses, and should of course be of serious concern to the Mods and Staff at ATS. But that is an issue of practical reality, not abstract justice. Ethically, there is no meaningful difference between accusing a public figure of nefarious deeds and accusing a private citizen. The only difference is that George Bush and Queen Elizabeth II are not likely to sue ATS if someone calls them lizards.
So, yes, I get it. The Mods and Owners needs to watch their butts. Fine.
But get off your high horse and stop pretending its some issue of moral rectitude and ethical uprightness when it's not.
The bloody hypocrisy I am seeing around here lately makes me sick to my stomach. A few kids get shot, and all of a sudden we're all about 'ethical' discussion.
I don't know what it is, but something about tragedy seems to bring out the moral self-righteousness of people.
You're the same schmucks you all were in October. So am I.
-R
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by Lulzaroonie
Thank god someone said something. After arguing that we know next to nothing about any of it, I've actively avoided the threads.
There's no arguing with people who wantt to jump at shadows.
The sad fact of the matter is, people are more worried about digging up the dirt in any manner possible than actually finding and validating facts.
This one topic (as well as the 2012 threads) are the main thing keeping me away right now.
This is the thing that is getting me, I've made but a few posts about the shootings, but there is the same feeling as you, jumping at shadows. The gun lobby was straight in, with various rationale, with Obama in his political frame, yet the gun lobby is in fact political in itself and far from apolitical as you might expect in a debating forum.
Quite frankly, WTF would anyone expect a country's leader to do under the circumstances, NOTHING?
What you do have is a situation where someone can cause all this tragedy and others, because of easy access to deadly weapons, while being, out of his/her mind, or on drugs, or senile, or didn't like his lawyer, or that his wife told him to get out his gun, or that someone had a funny walk, yes a mixture of cases, all documented. It is insane.edit on 25-12-2012 by smurfy because: Text.
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by RedBird
We aren't talking the moon landings were fake here. This is a highly charged, unprecedented, emotional situation very different from the rest of the tosh talked about across these boards.
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by RedBird
We aren't talking the moon landings were fake here. This is a highly charged, unprecedented, emotional situation very different from the rest of the tosh talked about across these boards.
With complete sincerity...this is something I see more from people defending official stories, than those examining the alternatives. The "official story" folks have their minds made up pretty quickly.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Laykilla
You failed to mention; a good investigator doesn't solely extrapolate information off the net either!
I wish this would stop. This is not a 9-11 event with a bevvy full of unanswered questions. This is a small town tragedy courtesy of a very disturbed individual. And much to the chagrin of the skeptics, they DO exist.
But some people I guess, just need to keep spinning and spinning until they co-create an entirely different reality far from what truly (and simply) happened.
This is a highly charged, unprecedented, emotional situation
Originally posted by fleabit
There is no such thing as censorship on a privately owned board. Sure, they could have a policy that states they try to let folks speak their mind, and limit censorship - but they are hardly beholden to such comments.
Originally posted by swansong19
Originally posted by fleabit
A few kids get shot, and all of a sudden we're all about 'ethical' discussion.
I doubt it was "all of a sudden." Probably more along the lines of saying something after a long period of degradation in the quality of posts on this site, where people refuse to use common sense or a do a modicum of research before boldly posting their crazy theory of the week.
With complete sincerity...this is something I see more from people defending official stories, than those examining the alternatives.
The "official story" folks have their minds made up pretty quickly.
The best example is 9/11. Can't tell you the number of times someone has said an alternative theory is stupid. So, I ask, have you felt that way since you first heard the idea of an alternate theory? They, of course, say yes.
So, why would someone who has their mind made up early on even bother to investigate?
Exactly.
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by swansong19
Originally posted by fleabit
A few kids get shot, and all of a sudden we're all about 'ethical' discussion.
I doubt it was "all of a sudden." Probably more along the lines of saying something after a long period of degradation in the quality of posts on this site, where people refuse to use common sense or a do a modicum of research before boldly posting their crazy theory of the week.
With complete sincerity...this is something I see more from people defending official stories, than those examining the alternatives.
The "official story" folks have their minds made up pretty quickly.
The best example is 9/11. Can't tell you the number of times someone has said an alternative theory is stupid. So, I ask, have you felt that way since you first heard the idea of an alternate theory? They, of course, say yes.
So, why would someone who has their mind made up early on even bother to investigate?
Exactly.
I understand what you say, but we are not yet at the stage of an 'official' story, that is what makes this whole speculation so ugly. the only hard facts so far seem to have come from the coroner, apart from the police identitification of the person responsible.