It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No offense taken. however, the majority of things listed have been definitively proven false. To treat them as though they are a possibility is to continue to spread disinfo.
Originally posted by Klassified
You may very well be right in each of these instances. But just because someone tells me something has been "debunked", doesn't mean mean it has been. That's just group think at its finest. It sounds very definitive, as though I'm not allowed to make up my own mind now that its been labeled "debunked".
However unlikely you may consider these scenarios to be, others still have to conclude that for themselves. Just a thought. No offense intended.
Originally posted by Kryyptyk
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I see what you are trying to do. Perhaps you should list the facts and then let the group extrapolate from that?
Claim 6)Sotos facebook page already existed: Answer: False. Even the creator of the page says flat out that it was a page that was re-appropriated to the topic after the fact.
...but ATS users surfing the net, are (rather conceitedly) much cleverer than they.
The owner of the page confirmed that the page was created for something else first, then changed when the event happened.
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by captaintyinknots
That's a good start, getting rid of the ridiculous conspiracy elements allows people to focus on the more important aspects of the discrepancies regarding the case.
The only one I have a question about is this:
Claim 6)Sotos facebook page already existed: Answer: False. Even the creator of the page says flat out that it was a page that was re-appropriated to the topic after the fact.
From what I understand, the name of the facebook page can be changed later but the URL of the page stays the same after creation, that url in question has RIP in it. I could be wrong but I don't think I am.
Sure it is. what exactly are you getting at? Are you saying that I am detracting from the truth?
Originally posted by Kryyptyk
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I thought you wanted the truth? The only way to get there is together.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by alfa1
Your argument goes for both sides in this debate. You just said it yourself.
...but ATS users surfing the net, are (rather conceitedly) much cleverer than they.
You've decided you're more clever(rather conceitedly) than other ATS users. Because they are such fools to question things you see as foolish to question. To question what is said by another member to be "definitively debunked".
"It now has a label folks. Nothing to see here, move along".
That determination should be made by each individual. I decide for myself whether another members evidence is definitive or not. Again, no offense is intended by my statements.
Who exactly decided these have been definitively debunked? Another ATS user(s).
Originally posted by ProphetOfZeal
This is a false flag inside job event. I smell troll/dis-info.
You didn't mention Rodia, as has already been exposed in the other thread. And one of the dozens of smoking guns here.
At 30:15 into the video link posted below, an officer asks for a license plate to be run.
"872 YEO"
Then at 30:40 Dispatch comes on and spells his name - Christopher A. Rodia. It's a bit garbled but then gives his birth date Aug 6 '69.
Listen here:
There is a Christopher A. Rodia in Connecticut, born in 1969. If you Google his name you will find an article from February 2012 about him stealing copper
Here's a video of the police taking a gun out of the trunk.
And yes, of course there are actors involved. Heard of crisis actors? Anyone with any common sense can see pretty much every interview features someone displaying extremely unsettling or odd behavior. Even the children, notice in every child interview, they show no signs of trauma..Columbine high school students showed trauma, there were pictures of the alleged shooters and victims and not everyone who was shot was killed. This is a terrible 'B' movie. I'm losing sleep over the fact that the majority believe anything the MSM is saying, and the official story.edit on 23-12-2012 by ProphetOfZeal because: (no reason given)edit on 23-12-2012 by ProphetOfZeal because: (no reason given)