It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vox2442
What's this 1979 agreement? That's a new one on me - link to more info, please?
As far as your other points, I think I've covered those above. I'll just add that your claims of secrecy don't really hold water - they were incorporated as terra nullis (as there was no evidence they had ever been inhabited), and there were no counter claims by any other nation. The claims were recognized internationally, and the data was added to the navigational charts. Maybe you think there should have been more fanfare, but let's face it, these are islands that are about the size of the average Australian farm.
I wasn't referring to the San Fran negotiations - I was referring to the 1895 treaty negotiations. The Senkakus were not mentioned in that treaty by anyone. Why not?
I'd suggest that the main reason is that they were never claimed by China - and the fact that there is no evidence that any Chinese have ever lived or worked on the islands seems to support that.
Originally posted by spangledbanner
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
reply to post by spangledbanner
Spot on! Thing is, some people believe in these myths spread in the West. It's good to know that not all Westerners have been 'brainwashed'.edit on 23-12-2012 by diqiushiwojia because: (no reason given)
Israel would have to agree,.
The important thing is who is there first.
( and sorry, I didnt actually even read your thread before commenting. I thought you were an ignorant westerner or some anti-China propagandist. ATS is full of them. )
Originally posted by spangledbanner
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
reply to post by spangledbanner
Spot on! Thing is, some people believe in these myths spread in the West. It's good to know that not all Westerners have been 'brainwashed'.edit on 23-12-2012 by diqiushiwojia because: (no reason given)
Israel would have to agree,.
The important thing is who is there first.
( and sorry, I didnt actually even read your thread before commenting. I thought you were an ignorant westerner or some anti-China propagandist. ATS is full of them. )