It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daaskapital
My objective here is to let people know the truth.
Originally posted by daaskapital
The bomb was still used to cause unnecessary suffering.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by daaskapital
My objective here is to let people know the truth.
By posting lies? that does not help at all!
Originally posted by daaskapital
reply to post by sonnny1
Okay...even if the civilians were soldiers, it still has no effect on the WMD droppings being war crimes.
The bomb was still used to cause unnecessary suffering.
Originally posted by daaskapital
The bombings caused unnecessary suffering on civilians in cities,
. Therefore, the USA broke the law.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by daaskapital
The bomb was still used to cause unnecessary suffering.
Wrong, it was used to force japan to surrender, and it took 2 of them for the Japanese to finally agree to surrender. And there many more on the way if necessary.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by daaskapital
reply to post by sonnny1
Okay...even if the civilians were soldiers, it still has no effect on the WMD droppings being war crimes.
The bomb was still used to cause unnecessary suffering.
I gave you the facts, as MANY in this thread have given you the facts.
Why are you being so obtuse?
The Japanese Generals themselves stated that the war would have continued if it wasn't for The Bombs and the Threat of Russia. Its Atomic revisionist history you are perpetrating in. The Japanese were committing suicide and killing their OWN children ! You cant just focus on the bombings, without focusing on the WHOLE picture.
Its disingenuous.
Just look how the Japanese viewed it.........
The commander of the 5th Japanese Army, General Simidzu, commented that "each nation lives and dies by its own laws."
Originally posted by daaskapital
Regardless, the survivors of the blast had to SUFFER for the rest of their lives.
So the bombs did in fact cause unnecessary suffering, and as such were war crimes.
As the Allied Powers developed the constitutions of these military tribunals, the existing international legal framework's limitations became apparent. For example, the Geneva and Hague Conventions in place during World War II were focused on the relationship between belligerent nations and military forces while ignoring, at least to some extent, war's impact on the civilian population. The Hague Convention of 1907 codified a series of limitations and protections only with respect to the treatment of the civilian population in an occupied territory.
Therefore, crimes perpetrated against the civilian populations of Poland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Yugoslavia, and the other countries invaded by Germany were punishable under the Hague Conventions. The crimes committed against German civilians, however, were not specifically covered under any of the existing conventions governing conduct during warfare because they were not committed by an invading power, but rather by the citizens' own government. This absence of law establishing protections for all civilians challenged the Tribunals' ability to hold military and civilian leaders of the Third Reich accountable for the war crimes committed against its own civilian population.
Art. 2. The inhabitants of a territory which has not been occupied, who, on the approach of the enemy, spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading troops without having had time to organize themselves in accordance with Article 1, shall be regarded as belligerents if they carry arms openly and if they respect the laws and customs of war.
While Japan no longer had a realistic prospect of winning the war, Japan's leaders believed they could make the cost of conquering Japan too high for the Allies to accept, which would lead to some sort of armistice rather than total defeat. The Japanese plan for defeating the invasion was called Operation Ketsugō (決号作戦 ketsugō sakusen?) ("Operation Codename Decisive"). The Japanese had secretly constructed an underground headquarters which could be used in the event of Allied invasion to shelter the Emperor and the Imperial General Staff.
In March 1945, there was only one combat division in Kyūshū. Over the next four months, the Imperial Japanese Army transferred forces from Manchuria, Korea, and northern Japan, while raising other forces in place. By August, they had 14 divisions and various smaller formations, including three tank brigades, for a total of 900,000 men.[22] Although the Japanese were able to raise large numbers of new soldiers, equipping them was more difficult. By August, the Japanese Army had the equivalent of 65 divisions in the homeland but only enough equipment for 40 and only enough ammunition for 30.[23]
In addition, the Japanese had organized the Patriotic Citizens Fighting Corps, which included all healthy men aged 15 to 60 and women 17 to 40 for a total of 28 million people, for combat support and, later, combat jobs. Weapons, training, and uniforms were generally lacking: some men were armed with nothing better than muzzle-loading muskets, longbows, or bamboo spears; nevertheless, they were expected to make do with what they had.[25]
One mobilized high school girl, Yukiko Kasai, found herself issued an awl and told, "Even killing one American soldier will do. ... You must aim for the abdomen."[26]
The Kokumin Giyū Sentōtai was intended as main reserve along with a "second defense line" for Japanese forces to sustain a war of attrition against invading forces. After the allied invasion, these forces were intended to form resistance or guerilla warfare cells in cities, towns or mountains.
Some 28,000,000 men and women were considered "combat capable" by the end of June 1945, yet only about 2,000,000 of them were recruited when the war ended, and most of them did not experience combats due to Japan's surrender before the Allied invasion of the Japanese home islands. The Battle of Okinawa took place before the formation of Volunteer Fighting Corps. [3] At this stage of the war, the lack of modern weaponry and ammunition meant that most were armed with swords or even bamboo spears.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by daaskapital
The bombings caused unnecessary suffering on civilians in cities,
Who said it was unnecessary? You?
. Therefore, the USA broke the law.
No they did not. All civilians were told to leave the city - but you ignore that, japan was told what would happen if they did not surrender, but both you and the japanese ignored that.
But keep being a Japanese apologist!
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by daaskapital
Regardless, the survivors of the blast had to SUFFER for the rest of their lives.
All due to the Japanese government, but you are unwilling to blame them! I wonder why....
So the bombs did in fact cause unnecessary suffering, and as such were war crimes.
No, it was not. Again why do you keep repeating that lie?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Xcathdra
I honestly don't understand why you insist on derailing this thread with facts.....
Originally posted by daaskapital
because the international law is what stands during times of war.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by daaskapital
because the international law is what stands during times of war.
"each nation lives and dies by its own laws."
Originally posted by Fromabove
reply to post by daaskapital
It was necessary to inflict damage on Japan with Atomic weapons. The damage was also unavoidable. So, there was no war crime committed. And besides, rules for war are stupid to say the least. The idea behind war is to destroy your enemy by whatever means possible in order to be the victor.
edit on 24-12-2012 by Fromabove because: (no reason given)
rules for war are stupid to say the least. The idea behind war is to destroy your enemy by whatever means possible in order to be the victor.
There were those who considered that the atomic bomb should never have been used at all. I cannot associate myself with such ideas… I am surprised that very worthy people—but people who in most cases had no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves—should adopt a position that rather than throw this bomb we should have sacrificed a million American and a quarter of a million British lives…
Winston Churchill, leader of the Opposition, in a speech to the British House of Commons, August 1945[7]
The U.S. anticipated losing many soldiers in the planned invasion of Japan, although the number of expected fatalities and wounded is subject to some debate. U.S. President Truman stated in 1953 he had been advised U.S. casualties could range from 250,000 to one million men.
Some historians see ancient Japanese warrior traditions as a major factor in the resistance in the Japanese military to the idea of surrender. According to one Air Force account,
"The Japanese code of bushido—'the way of the warrior'—was deeply ingrained. The concept of Yamato-damashii equipped each soldier with a strict code: never be captured, never break down, and never surrender. Surrender was dishonorable. Each soldier was trained to fight to the death and was expected to die before suffering dishonor. Defeated Japanese leaders preferred to take their own lives in the painful samurai ritual of seppuku (called hara kiri in the West). Warriors who surrendered were not deemed worthy of regard or respect."[21