Connecticut State law Sec. 53-202c. Possession of assault weapon prohibited., page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 22-12-2012 @ 10:15 PM by litterbaux
Assault weapons were already banned in the state of Connecticut before the tragedy that happened in Sandy Hook.

If you think new laws are going to prevent this, you are wrong.

Source

There is no way to stop gun violence. If lets pretend we changed the word "drugs" to "gun", look how the war on drugs is going. Complete waste of money and a complete failure. Although guns can kill people.

I don't have a solution to the problem but banning guns is an obvious failure. Assault rifles were already banned and it happened, so let's ban guns again?

Idiocy


reply posted on 22-12-2012 @ 11:11 PM by ParanoidAmerican
reply to post by litterbaux



To be fair it does not define "assault weapon" there (it may in another section). Real Assault Weapons civilians can not legally own any w/o an FFL.


reply posted on 22-12-2012 @ 11:14 PM by ParanoidAmerican
reply to post by InfaRedMan



Tell that to the collector.....I know people that buy guns weekly because they 'like' them....I call it addiction there is no reason to own every type of gun...


reply posted on 28-12-2012 @ 05:58 PM by woogleuk
reply to post by oper8zhin



And gun crime in the UK is only a fraction of the USA because people can't just freely drive to the next county and purchase weapons, getting them into the country is near impossible, and people are too afraid to take the risk of facing hefty jail sentences for getting caught with them.

After reading many views on gun control these last couple of weeks, I have changed my tune on American gun laws. However, I still believe banning AR is a sensible thing to do, there is absolutely no need for them.

EDIT: edited as it seems you edited yours.

Firearms aren't banned in the UK, there is just tighter control on who can have them and what type they can have.

I could apply for a firearms permit right now, and there is nothing legally stopping me. I can choose from a wide range of shotguns and rifles.

The misconception that everything gets banned in the UK is a tiresome one and simply not true.
edit on 28/12/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-12-2012 @ 01:14 AM by nottelling
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to
post by oper8zhin



And gun crime in the UK is only a fraction of the USA because people can't just freely drive to the next county and purchase weapons, getting them into the country is near impossible, and people are too afraid to take the risk of facing hefty jail sentences for getting caught with them.

After reading many views on gun control these last couple of weeks, I have changed my tune on American gun laws. However, I still believe banning AR is a sensible thing to do, there is absolutely no need for them.

EDIT: edited as it seems you edited yours.

Firearms aren't banned in the UK, there is just tighter control on who can have them and what type they can have.

I could apply for a firearms permit right now, and there is nothing legally stopping me. I can choose from a wide range of shotguns and rifles.

The misconception that everything gets banned in the UK is a tiresome one and simply not true.
edit on 28/12/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)


Correct me if I'm wrong about the US viewpoint, but I believe they would be concerned more about the registration aspects of firearms ownership in the UK and Commonwealth countries. After all, a tightly legislated firearms ownership environment always includes registration of individual firearms as an adjunct to a weapons licensing scheme - that becomes by default an up-to-date list of gun owners and the weapons they possess.

Gun registration is implemented for two main reasons:

1. So that security forces can see how many weapons a given citizen has - at a glance.

2. So that security forces know when to stop looking in the event that they are ordered to remove weapons from the possession of any given citizen.

LICENSING of the gun owner provides for character and background checks and although it's not all that nice to have the government of the day ALLOW you to own a firearm that you bought with your own hard-earned money, it's a hell of a lot more palatable than registration of individual weapons. Disarmyoutards support weapon registration because they can take them away from you if they so wish.

UK gun owners are tolerated by the UK powers that be, but there are safeguards built into the system which provide for the guns in the community to be taken away at any time. Compare that to the US culture of gun ownership not only being a right, but a serious piece of Americana built right into their constitution.

THAT my friend is why the Americans consider all these other countries' firearms laws to be draconian - and from that perspective the laws are.

Of course no one in the UK talks about the wide proliferation of illegal weapons throughout the criminal community. Most news on the topic is suppressed and for statistics you need to delve deeply into the bowels of the police or home office websites. The UK government are the masters of perception-management.

Then again, it's not all the government's fault - most Londoners will tell you that CCTV is non-invasive and is an effective deterrent to crime. Most have swallowed the kool-aid and asked for seconds. If it wasn't for a large portion of the community conforming there wouldn't be any bad governments. Not singling out the UK for that one - just using it to illustrate a point.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags