It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I still believe in IQ, in terms of some have it, some ain't. The ability to discern new pathways is an evolutionary necessity, as are most of the attributes of someone considered to have a high IQ. Spatial skills, putting one foot in front of the other. Pattern recognition and what it means to survival or comfort (i.e. Where the best restrooms are).
Am not being funny but anyone with a reasonable level of common sense already knew the IQ test was a pretty arbitrary measure of intelligence that didn't really have a great deal of significance in the real world.
Since IQ tests are timed can I argue that it is just a measurement of the rate of comprehension, or will I get attacked for such a remark?
I can't argue with you there. But what if I can get 2+2 in one second and my friend can get it in five seconds. That adds up to I don't give a sh^t.
Perhaps, but you only have five seconds to determine it...
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by fastbob72
Am not being funny but anyone with a reasonable level of common sense already knew the IQ test was a pretty arbitrary measure of intelligence that didn't really have a great deal of significance in the real world.
Am not being funny but anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence already knows that intelligence varies from person to person, and can be measured by having test subjects try to answer a series of increasingly difficult problems to gauge how smart they are in relation to others that also took the test.
Duh.
What exactly constitutes intelligence in the real world ??
a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests)
Actually, my only reason for posting was that I thought it was silly to equate intelligence with finding the "best" bathroom, as stated by a previous poster.
Originally posted by Ahabstar
Glad to see there is a study that has caught up to one of the things I have been saying for years. First and foremost, IQ tests only test current knowledge and the speed to which it is recalled. The better a person's recall (or photographic memory) the higher their IQ, provided they have been taught the material covered. For example, a 5 year old may have a grasp of addition and subtraction, but multiplication and division would be unusual concepts...algebra, geometry's theorems and proofs as well as trigonometry functions would be alien for a 5 year old and would not be tested by any sane IQ test for the age level.
Can a 5 year old do multiplication and division? Yes, of course they can. They can understand the rational behind it if properly explain to them as well. But doing so is not an indication of intelligence unless they can quickly figure out basic concepts such as multiplication is commutative just as addition is.
So basically knowledge is the sum of information that you know, IQ is how quickly you can access that knowledge and intelligence is how you adapt that information outside the original data. For example 1 x 3 = 3 is knowledge. Answering without calculating or counting on fingers is a degree of IQ, figuring out on your own that any number multiplied by 1 is always that original number is a level of intelligence...if you were told that fact, then it is knowledge and remembering that you were told it is IQ.
Hope I explained that well enough.
The two fallacies that are present concerning the principles of IQ testing are: reification and hereditarianism. The hereditarianism fallacy claims that intellect can be passed on, through genes, to the progeny of a person.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by fastbob72
What exactly constitutes intelligence in the real world ??
a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests)
I believe a better arguement for the OP would not have been that IQ tests are flawed, but I don't care what my score is cause I can play the Jazz flute really good.