posted on Dec, 23 2012 @ 05:03 AM
The TimeWave concept was quite clearly laid out by MeKenna and others as culminating in December 2012 with "infinite novelty." Not that there was ever
a time I wasn't skeptical of it, but the point is that it was thoroughly debunked by the promised "infinite novelty" not taking place by two days ago,
and that debunking happened right here on ATS.
It was followed, documented, and chronicled for more than three years in an admirable attempt to legitimize it in
this ATS topic
, with the dedicated work of several posters, and that attempt failed.
TimeWave Zero has been thoroughly debunked by that topic, which is a valuable resource for future TW discussion, and any time the goal posts get
moved, that topic should be referenced. We need to start using previously covered ground on ATS rather than starting fresh with every new iteration of
something that has already been debunked.
People have the right to their beliefs, and if they wish to create some new, original interpretation of the concept and adhere to it... that's their
business. But in terms of the original TimeWave concept as articulated by McKenna et al, the addition of a new date only contributes to its debunking,
and is a classic example of moving the goal posts in my opinion.
edit on 12/23/2012 by AceWombat04 because: Typo