posted on Dec, 21 2012 @ 02:57 PM
For all you anti-gun people that believe that an armed populace of over 100 million people cannot compete with a well traianed well equipped high
technology armed fighting force, please answer how they might counteract the following hypothetical situation.
A man puts together a five man group of skilled hunters and or ex combat veterans. they have only the legally allowed firearms currently available and
whatever they can scrounge from the local hardware store. They have decided to assasinate local low key federal agents from organizations like the TSA
or DHS or any other similar group. After plotting said assasinations they begin to follow through with their plans.
By doing this they instantly remove the threat of any large scale military retaliation for two reasons.
1. They cannot endanger the civilian populace that might support the government.
2. they cannot find the five man terrorist group, because after each operation they split up, go home, and go back to their day job until the next
They have instilled fear into the the low level beaurocracy by taking out random agents. This immediately slows down the organization and willingness
of these agents to go into work and perform their appointed duties. This slows down the government. A slower government cannot react fast enough to
compensate for these random five man groups that start to pop up all over the country.
As these five man groups start to increase and the beaurocracy starts to decrease you now have a government trying to control a military that cannot
react fast enough out of hardened bunkers that cannot be penetrated. As the military cannot deploy larger scale weapons on the civilian populace the
military itself starts to become a target.
How do you take out a military instalation from an outnumbered 40 to 1 group?
You remove the supply chain. An ancient tactic used on any large groug but even more possible by the shere number of attackers.
You shut off all sup[lies in and out of the military bases. Control the food and fuel and you now control the military.
The local and federal agents are too scared to go out and try to find these terrorists and know that they are now outnumbered by 40-1 with a growing
animosity of the populace. The Government cannot turn to the people for help and the terrorists or freedom fighters have the sfull support of this
how would you stop this hypothetical terrorist/freedom movement if you were the government?
Now maybe you might understand how the average Joe Blow and a few simply armed accomplices can lead to the downfall of a major military battle and why
the government is so hell bent on removing firearms from the populace.
As I said this is all hypothetical but I will willing engage and serious debate. Flamers need not apply.