posted on Dec, 21 2012 @ 03:38 PM
While this principle posting did occur as you indicate, it does not prove in any way that "the real" Sandy Hook principle, made the statement. I
will offer some discussion to make my point.
The recent comments by CT Vance where he indicates people impersonating people would be prosecuted, could be because of this so called report by a
dead principle that from a glance might appear as a contradiction to matters that she died, until you get to looking at the evidence and see that no
video or evidence exists that the real principle made the statement.
We are living in an age where the hoaxers and liars that are constantly trying to get unearned attention, could have posted that article and or made
statements while pretending to be the dead principle.
It is good that such discrepancy gets noted, but logical thinking would require us trying to find anything that can prove the the person who is
supposed to be dead, actually is alive. Basing that dead or alive concern on a statement made on a web site, is not how matters are derived or
investigated to be factual.
It would be more important to discuss if the principle is actually alive and if so, who said so, what evidence do they have that can prove the
deception, because without it, we should not so quickly embrace the "She's Alive" theory just because an article is stated to be made by her and or
because the posting disappears after the fact.
It could have disappeared, because it was a hoax, and checking with the original posting source could have answered why it was removed.
It is this type of mental failure to check what we are told for ourselves that leads to threads discussing a conspiratorial matter with no conspiracy
in the matter, other than someone perhaps pretending to be the dead principle. The removal of the posting to me is logical to see disappear, because
the posting is a fraud.
If someone truly wants to get into the Sandy Hook shooting and truly seeks to connect the dots, then posting a thread about a so called statement,
does nothing but spread more disinformation that the mind numb masses can do without.
If the principle is not dead, then something other than a "evidence free statement," should be used to justify a thread that claims she is alive and
not dead. A web statement being removed just wont cut it.
Once again this is the type of matter that would best be served by a dislike button like on other social media sites, because there are too many ATS
threads that only ask questions and offer no meat and no potatoes, just fluff that appears more for the acquisition of Flags than the truth. To some,
Flags matter more than being logical or being helpful to helping others think about real matters that concern us all.
Infantile thinking for flags is a plague and it is here on ATS as it is everywhere, but now that you know my dislike for this type of thread, I would
have to say that I enjoy reading conspiratorial threads, but some aren't threads of conspiracies at all, they are made just to generate ATS flags
that undermines the quality of real threads discussing real conspiracy matters based on some small discovered fact or evidence that allows the logical
to see that there is indeed a flaw or conspiracy in play.
Thanks for discussing the matter, because it makes the recent public remarks of CT Vance more clear to me in why he stated what he stated the day he
said what he said about prosecuting those who impersonate officials.
That's my take on the matter. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss baseless threads. We cant avoid baseless postings, but in the matter of
baseless threads, an improvement is needed, in my humble opinion.