It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The wealthy 65-year-old Swiss banker showed the wheelchair-bound 74-year-old videos of 'palm-fringed beaches and luxury hotels' to convince him to come on the trip.
The woman - who had been paying £6,000 a month in care bills - then took him to a poverty-stricken suburb of New Delhi and paid a family £1,500 a month to take him in.She then jetted home alone to continue her life of luxury in Zurich, a court in Winterthur was told.But nine months after the trip in January 2008, the husband died due to 'lack of care and poor hygiene' and his body was cremated and thrown into a river, it was heard.
During the trial, the woman - who can not be named for legal reasons - insisted her acions had been in her husband's best interests due to the 'warm climate' in India. The woman was jailed for six months after an initial trial last year, but prosecutors appealed the sentence and she was jailed for four years this week for kidnapping.
Daily Mail
...
Originally posted by ollncasino
A wealthy Swiss banker took her wheelchair bound 74 year old husband on a 'holiday of a lifetime' to India and then left him there. Nine months later he died due to 'lack of care and poor hygiene' in the Indian care home he had been left in and his body was cremated and thrown into a river.
Daily Mail
Originally posted by SilentE
What a horrible thing to do.
Why can't she be named?
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
Originally posted by SilentE
What a horrible thing to do.
Why can't she be named?
My guess is she's associated with the name of a bank that all of us would recognize, so this is just to avoid bad public-relations.
Originally posted by SilentE
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
Originally posted by SilentE
What a horrible thing to do.
Why can't she be named?
My guess is she's associated with the name of a bank that all of us would recognize, so this is just to avoid bad public-relations.
I thought it could be that.
If that's the reason and it most probably is, it's nice that the banks are keeping us in the know...
If we did find out which bank she worked at, wouldn't that be worse for the banks public relations?