posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 06:58 PM
reply to post by Maskander
I didn't see this yesterday, and was redirected here from another thread where the OP asks if Sandy Hook was a setup by the government to take minds
off the end of the world. Ugh it hurts to even try to consider that in a logical sense, the insufferable stupidity of it.
But you describe the EXACT thing I've tried to, but most likely failed to relay as I'm often tied up in suffocating thoughts of "WTF" at some of
the things I read here.
How can some of these same candidates offer the same reasoning for everything, when half the time they conflict with each other. You can't have one
scenario that is 100% reality to someone, and then go on 100% about something else which either partially disproves the former thing, OR cannot both
It's like they get all excited to describe some fantastic scenario, they get their jollies, and then move onto the next one, forgetting about the
And this, this is just the tip of the ice berg. If you really examine the amount of evidence that is discarded in the search for that illogical
fallacy that must be true, it's bewildering how some people function in life without bumping into closed doors every day.
A million Rainbow Sprinkler Ladies.. that's how insane it is...