reply to post by foodstamp
Ok, Assuming your correct. What do you think this means?
One of two things,
Either these kinds of things are coded in at a universe level (meaning that these numbers show up like this due to the universe's math, like a pine
cone being coded for the fibanacci sequence.)
Or that these are intentionally coded in because these kinds of things aren't as random as they might appear and happen as a part of an occult ritual
by the Illuminati/PTB
It's interesting to me to do this kind of analyzing of mass murders, especially when they happened so long ago, only to find they follow the same
numerological format as similar things that happen today. I actually did an analysis using wikipedia's list of mass murders through history. I started
in the late 1800's and had 1000 data points to work with. In the final analysis, the occurrence of the ritually important numbers was strongly
statistically significant. 1000 data points is across more than 100 years is a pretty strong analytic set.
How deeply coded are these things? Sometimes (often but not always) right down to the ages of the victims. I don't know how this is accomplished (one
fellow researcher thinks it is a super computer a'la the Matrix) but it's there.
Here are the ages for CT
16 6 year olds 1+6+6=13
4 7 year olds 7+4=11
and the adults
Rachel Davino, 29 2+9=11
Dawn Hocksprung, 47 4+7=11
Anne Marie Murphy, 52 5+2=7
Lauren Rousseau, 30
Mary Sherlach, 56 5+6=11
Victoria Soto, 27 7+2=9
So three 11's, 7, 9, and 3
One great example of this is the Tuscon shootings because the numbers show up not only in their ages but the distances in between:
Christina Taylor Green, 9,
John Roll, 63,
Dorothy "Dot" Morris, 76,
Dorwan Stoddard, 76,
Phyllis Schneck, 79,
Gabriel "Gabe" Zimmerman, 30,
So we have (reduced) 9, 9, 13, 13, 7(7+9=16, 1+6=7), and 3
and to top it off the 9yo was born on 9/11/01 and the shooter was born 9/10/88-exactly 13 yrs and 1 day apart.
and the distance between the ages of those killed:
30-9 is 21 (2+1=3), 63-30=33, 76-63=13, 79-76=3
two 3's, 13, and 33...really...
Very interesting to me is the "misreporting" by the NYT in your OP. You included it as an example of how reporters make mistakes but 33 kids (with 33
being a very significant #) ?
Just like, initially I saw reports in CT of 27 dead, 18 of them children (2+7=9, 1+8=9, plus 27-18=9.)
Even the "mistakes" seem to be numerically significant
Let's go deeper into Bath though, since that is the topic and look at the ages of the victims of this "lone madman"
The ages of the adults
55, 33, 33, 52 (5+2=7), 74 (7+4=11), 30, 21 (2+1=3)
So two 33, two 3's, 11, 7, and another double number 55. Sounds about right. Using the same formula for the kids in Bath as I did for the kids in CT
we get:
7yo 1 = 8
8 yo 10 =9
9yo 4 =13
10yo 5 =6
11yo 5 =7
12yo 8 =11
13yo 4 =8
14yo 1 =6
So 7, 11, 9. 13 all numbers that I have been discussing with the addition of 2 8's and 2 6's
So, regardless of whether or not you believe in this, the same numbers keep coming up again and again, often with minimal math games (like just
measuring the number of years between the ages of victims-no make it say what you want accusations there-13 years is 13 years.) And if they are
statistically significant (which they are) that leads us back to the conclusion of one of the two options I gave at the beginning.
edit on 19-12-2012 by coyotepoet because: (no reason given)