It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because to many people are involved in the posting of various diets of all species. Those diets all confirm the patterns I have observed in all of them, and those patterns confirm Target Food exists.
I really don't understand why you are allowing yourself...and I guess I am allowing myself too...LOL!...to be baited into attempting to prove something that is not only OBVIOUS...but is Scientifically PROVEN to be a FACT?
We are argueing with people that are so ingrained in a Belief System that they cannot have the ability to even see a FACT right before their eyes as when they look at such facts they do so with their EYES ALREADY CLOSED.
You taking things out of context is not me avoiding questions, but one day you will learn this.
And that is how you reply a second time to a post showing how you have again misread what I posted to avoid the question. Incredible.
Yep, and that is true.
Your golden rule. You made the rule. There can be no processes that are not natural and/or caused by means that are not natural.
You have no proof of the aleged processes, so your guessing.
You claimed that rule to be a fact. If by claiming a win you mean your rules when tested against your claims show target food fails then yes, you won. You proved target food false
I'm not in any pickle, any two non native species can still be native to each other.
I'm afraid it does. I refer you back to the previous pages where I test your rules against your claims. You’re in a pickle for sure.
It fails from being natural to earth, but not to the other species. The relationship is between the consumer and the food not the consumer and the planet.
Your recent revelation that ALL organic life was not from here apart from maybe bacteria shows ALL organic life’s involvement in anything is unnatural, not just mans. Now when you apply your golden rule the result is always the same. Target food fails.
You frequently move the goal posts, see how dishonest you are.
They are your goalposts. The fantasy is yours.
I find it hard to believe that it took you a complete year to realize that no life is native to earth, however that doesn't mean they can't be native to each other.
Unfortunately for you when you admitted that no organic life was from here not just man, your fantasy target food failed. No organic life on this planet is natural. No actions it takes are natural. Organic life is both food and consumer. Apply your golden rule and target food fails every time.
Why would I close a threat that proves Evolution wrong. Why would I ignore the fact that it proves intelligence must have been present to program the instinct for food. Target Food is very strong, and upstanding.
That’s fine because if you have nothing new to offer the road for target food really is closed.
Not natural to earth, but they can be natual to other species.
I am not applying it to the planet. I am applying it to the organic life that your rules say is not natural.
But genomes don't prove relation anymore than creation does.
I will say this again as well as tell you and anyone else that....
.....THERE IS A 100% PROVEN FACT THAT HUMANS ARE GENETICALLY CONNECTED TO EVERY SPECIES ON THE PLANET THAT WE HAVE CROSS REFERENCED THEIR GENOMES TO OURS.
The entire flux of evolution is based on probability, there is no solid proof, its all guess work. You seriously need to pick up a history book and learn something.
This is a FACT. It is a WELL KNOWN FACT.
Not only do we have the fossil records...although not totally complete...but more than complete enough to make such an assumption bases on such an EXTREME level of probability.
But fossil records and genomes don't prove relation any more than creation does.
The Fossil records ALONE would be more than enough proof but we also have the proof in all the species DNA and complete mapped GENOMES. This PROOF is irrefutable.
All Species Genomes that we have mapped all contain one specific VIRAL DNA ENCODING within all Genomes and Including OURS!
There is no scientific method that has proven that a species can evolve into another species. Your guessing, again.
Because of this it is IMPOSSIBLE that there can be any other FACT than we all EVOLVED from a COMMON ANCESTOR. This is not my Belief based on what I think or Feel. It is a FACT based on OBSERVATION, EXPERIMENTATION, DOCUMATION and PRACTICLE APPLICATION....called the SCIENTIFIC METHOD
IT IS A FACT....AS WELL AS A TRUTH.
Quit guessing, pull out some facts for once.
Confirming what I wrote:
Everything I have been shown cleary tells me that evolution is a fantasy.
Thank you for confirming this.
That would be false again, I'm looking for somone to prove Target Food wrong, but to do so honestly, not by moving the goal posts which you frequently do.
Your previous reply shows that to be a very suspect remark. Your denial of target food failing every time your claims are tested against your rules further illustrates you do not want proof of anything. You want capitulation. Wrong site. Wrong forum.
You had your response to your attempt to steer the topic away from the failed target food.
My understanding is clear, everything I have been directed to about evolution clearly states that it is a fantasy.
You often confuse intent with reason. You also do not understand the meaning of evolution, let alone evolution theory. Random processes as an underlying mechanism is robust enough that it is used in computer algorithms. Genetic algorithms work well and are employed in engineering, chemistry, and other areas. Just because you cannot understand the material has no bearing on other people
A hypothesis is an educated guess based on what information is available at the time, this by no means tells you that its fact. A scientific fact, is an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed. No one has ever witnessed a species changing into another species, so your lying, and trying to dumb down other people. Stick to making jokes, your good at that.
Nothing but useless musings. Come back when you have something to say.
Posting a definition does not mean you understand it. Your posts reveal you do not. You clearly do not understand the meanings of hypothesis, scientific theory, evolution, and many other terms.
I took basic biology in high school when you were in diapers, and I passed. There was nothing that proved that a species can change into another species, I think your looking in the fiction section.
Your poor writing and poor spelling and misuse of words and lack of understanding of basic terms suggests otherwise. Take a basic course in biology when you get to high school and learn.
What your really saying is that because they are not visible today, just like evolution, your not going to believe in them. Never mind that they could have existed at one time, and most of the evidence can be washed away with time. Basically your telling me that if you can't touch it and see it, its not real, and that doesn't work in the supernatural. Your way off.
Pointless commentary. The bible is full of fiction from exodus to genesis to the flood to the mention of imaginary places like Sodom and Gomorrah.
No one has ever witnessed a species changing into another species, therefore, you have a faith, you believe it can happen with no proof.
No faith involved on my part. Your response here is laughable.
A fact is just something that is used as evidence, I'm more interested in proof, and you should be too. You need to lean away from the guessing and the assumptions and come over to the real world.
Take a basic course when you get to high school and learn the meaning of fact.
Did you have anything that was convincing?
Reread the thread and see the evidence.
The theory of target food has been posted several times ON THIS THREAD.
Not posted in this thread.
And still you don't answer.
Straw man argument from desperation.
I don't need to read the articles. Wiki never had possesion of the skull to do their own tests, they are just bashing his version of what the skull is based on the fact that the skull has some human properties.
Wikipedia article contains two links to lab reports that show Pye wrong. Read the reports and learn.
Of course I do.
Sitchin and Pye and VonDaniken are liars. Learn something for a change.
If you want something debunked then point out one of their stupid lies and I can point you to the reason it is a lie. Frankly, I don't believe you know anything about their claims.
Aside from propagation there is nothing in the wild that can change our DNA and I challenge anyone to prove this wrong.
Please provide proof of this claim. We all know you can't since it is wrong. Go ahead show us proof
Look at the fantasy you believe in, you actually think that our DNA can change in the wild, with no proof.
When you get to high school take a basic course in biology. This is a foolish claims since evolution affects a species not an individual. Despite being told that many times you continue to post nonsense statements such as that. All of those silly emoticons are just laughing at you.
First of all no one ever claimed that I'm the only one that believes this, that was your assumption. You need to close your assumption generator when dealing with me, it takes up a lot of our time.
I see so because you post your nonsense on another site and people might see it so they are observing target food in action. Jeeze that's weak even for you.
You say the bible agrees but what I see is you have used your usual level of reading and made a fantasy around what you think you read.
For the bible to be 'a clear historical document' that is what it must be, clear. You even maintain that the god the bible is based on is an imposter. That what it say's about adam and eve is wrong and only you can understand it and dont even need knowledge of ancient Hebrew to understand better than scholars that spend a life time of study.
I never read anything that proved this to be a fact, do you have something other than opinion?
Evolution is not intelligent or guided.
Wrong, man can frequently replicate what happens in nature, in fact that only thing I'm aware of that we can't replicate is honey.
That appears to be impossible for you to learn. Man often cannot replicate what happens in nature. Just because we can figure out how to replicate a process or even create a process that does not happen in nature has no bearing on natural events.
Quite, the opposite, I learned from others here on ATS about evolution, and am convinced after the fact that evolution is fantasy.
Just because you are unable to learn about these matters has no bearing on the ability of other people to understand these matters. Your posts are appeals based on personal ignorance.
The only things I have been presented with is that food evolves with the rest of us, so there is no explanation. Evolution is not an explanation of the aleded events, its an excuse.
Overwhelming amount of evidence and proof already posted in thread.
Well then you failed becasue I'm still here, post that proof.
Evidence and proof, not opinion, already posted in thread showing that TF is wrong.
Their experimentation still lands them in their food catagory, so you are wrong and I have allready explained this in the past.
That's just your drivel posted in another place.
Deer experiment with food. Evidence already posted in this thread.
Put your money where your mouth is, prove it.
Take a course in biology when you get to high school.
It's not irrelevant, its where our defects came from.
I'm not interested in your whimsical understandings.
Take a basic course in geology and learn. This is another appeal from personal ignorance.
Your ignorant, there is something like 57 elements that prove that skull to not be human. It has more brain mass, but not in defect, no iniot, shallow eye sockets that couldn't possibly house OUR eyes. A larger frontal lobe, different neck axis, a smaller mouth, 5 adult teeth wating to come down with existing adult teeth, a smaller bite radius, Skull is more that of enamal then bone, they had a problem cutting it in the lab and had to use the strongest acid possible.
Your conclusion is without merit. There is zero evidence that the skull is anything other than human.
The first results were proven to be false by the second lab test, but you would know that if you read the notes on the tests.
The reports state that. Pye is a stunning example of his own book title "Everything You Know is Wrong". Yes is wrong is almost every way. One of his dumbest ideas is that there are 4 groups of hominids: bigfoot, yetis, agogwes and almas. So when this wacko Pye was unable to fit this skull into his fantasy he invented a new category. Pye went from wacko to nutcase on this one. When the reports showed him wrong he did the only thing a wacko could do: he ignored the results.
I'm going to take your strawman comment that I'm correct.
Straw man argument from someone with nothing to say.
Its only irrelevant when it once again shows that your right and everyon else is wrong.
Be a man and post your proof. Whats the matter, don't you have any?
Already posted in thread.
Your evidence is false, can you post something credible.
Evidence already posted in thread.
Your claims are false, can you post something credible.
TF proved false many times in this thread.
Did you have something a little more credible.
Try something credible.
There is nothing nonsensicle about my comment.
Your comment was nonsensical.
There is nothing wrong with my posts.
As I stated before your writing is poor and clumsy. You misspelled writing and you're. You misuse words. That is what makes your posts difficult to respond to.
When you make it through high school, I hope you learn that anything that is responsible for creating over a billion species is a CREATOR.
When you get to high school take a biology course so you can learn the meaning of the words you do not understand such as evolution, and theory and hypothesis. That will be a building block for you.
Some of those changes are accounted for, as in the case of ADHD, so your fantasy is false.
Evolution is the observed change in the genetics of a population. Evolution is not changing the DNA. Evolution is the observed change. Someday I expect you to learn that.
You connected dots showing that speciation means a species is changing, but there is no proof, but you connected the dots anyhow. You connected the dots showing that a species has the ability to change into another species again with no proof, but again you connected the dots.
Global, local, same thing, the water has to move somewhere.
Another appeal from personal ignorance.
There is more reliable information in Target Food then there is evolution.
Proof that you are wrong already posted in thread.
Maybe its you with the proor skills.
Pointless commentary, also unintelligible.
Still there is proof of great floods all over this planet.
No proof of a global flood, only local floods.