reply to post b
y solomons path
:lol nice analogy
As far as the original circle on the table? Someone else drew it. It had an Intelligent Designer
Seriously though, when you state.....
That's what evolutionary theory is saying. Ask any biologist and they will tell you the same. Thereis no deviationin definition. It's the
anti-evolution crowd that claims it means origin oflife. I'm assuming to rally support of the followers behind religious propaganda.
You seem to be an intelligent person. Can you truly not see all of the holes in the theory? I honestly believe many are willfully in denial. They
are scared of the alternative.
How can you honestly believe that evolution has nothing to do with the beginning of life?
You told me earlier to pick up a college textbook and read it from cover to cover.
I would ask that you just read the chapter dealing with evolution. Does it not also deal with the origin of life?
It is in every biology textbook I have ever seen.
Common decent has to deal with the beginning of life. There is no way around this and that is the exact reason why evolutionist try to distance
themselves from the genisis of life.
Most definitions of evolutionary biology state that it is the study of species (plural) from a common ancestor (singular). Which would mean the first
form of life. There is absolutely no evidence of this. It can not be studied, it can not be tested and it can not be observed. It is not
Truly, it is those who need to believe in evolution who do not understand the definitions of it.
I would also like to state that I have not posted anything about how life began beside at the top of this post when I said an Intelligent Designer
drew your original circle.
My original post was about how many posters came on this thread to tell the op that he did not know the definition of evolution, yet none of them
offered a definition.
There are many definitions depending on what type you are speaking of.
That being said, evolutionary biology for the most part is a lie. It is not science but wishful thinking on the part of those who deny Intelligent
Design. There is very little SOLID proof besides our ability to adapt (micro-evolution).
In most cases we see many evolutionist applying evidence to THE theory when they should actually be applying a theory to the evidence. That is how
science is supposed to work. If your theory does not work, find another that does.