Originally posted by phyllida
For those that say we look for conspiracies where there are none well 1) this is a conspiracy website and its what we do
I agree, but there has to be some genuine basis for a conspiracy to be suggested. With 9/11, there is scientific reason to mistrust the official
story, there are multiple witness statements of explosions from people within, there are known and proven examples of movements of money prior to the
attack, after 11 years there are still fundamental flaws in the official story that leave the events open to question.
With the Aurora shooting there were again reasons to doubt. There was photographic evidence that the gas mask was not in the place it should have
been, there were statements from those within that led us to believe there could have been more than one person.
With this case, there are wild accusations about the parents being "actors", there are claims that the children never existed, there are suggestions
that the words "Sandy Hook" were NEVER, EVER used before last Friday by anyone, ever, and if they were then they were in on some master plan, and
there are even suggestions that a global secret society (one that has managed to stay invisible for supposedly hundreds of years) is advertising their
plans on TV, leaving messages to be decoded - that the movies are "talking to people".
And this is all within one week, while the real reports are still confusing and the real investigations into all of this are not even half way
Does anyone recall what happened on 9/11? For weeks after it there were all kinds of things reported by the media that turned out to be false,
confused, or just the result of lazy reporting. They are all scrambling for the ratings, and they'll say anything to get those numbers.
There are always going to be things that do not make sense - the entire scenario doesn't make sense. Not because there are inconsistencies after only
6 days of investigation and reporting, but simply because to do something like this takes a certain level of insanity that requires things to not make
People are saying it makes no sense that he would use a certain type of gun, but that's the least confusing part about all of this - why would anyone
do this to begin with? People cannot apply common sense and intellect to this criminal, clearly he was mentally unsound. If he'd arrived there in drag
it would be less confusing than the fact he arrived there to kill little kids.
People cannot judge his actions against the actions of a sane person, because he clearly wasn't sane.
Originally posted by phyllida
2) if the official stories of the various events weren't as holey as the Pope then there would be no suspicions. None of us have access to the
evidence and never will, all the information we have is gleaned from MSM etc and the most we can do is read between the lines use some commons sense
and logic (something the PTB seem to lack) and see the bigger picture. Throwing ideas around is what gets results and makes people think.
But that's just the point, we are only six days in, and people here expect there to be a proven and solid narrative. That's not going to happen, and
the fact that it hasn't happened is not evidence of anything more than the expected confusion in a criminal investigation where the eyes of a whole
nation are watching, and the ears of every news room are picking up and reporting anything they can get their hands on to keep them in the lead.
If there was a shooting of one person in your street that for some reason got the attention of every news broadcaster in America, what would be a
simple shooting would become a convoluted mess of rumour, speculation, suspicion and biased reporting. America has some of the most biased reporting
on the planet, and you all admit this freely, but you STILL hold them up as evidence when they tell you what you want to hear - ie that there is
Example - reports suggested there was someone else detained. But don't you think that this would have been mentioned by the police by now? Let me
guess, the hundreds of LOCAL police, people who grew up around these families and worked in their community all their lives are somehow in on the
conspiracy too, they all suddenly agreed to be complicit in the murders of 20 little kids and 6 of their fellow adults?
You say this is about logic and common sense, but I'm seeing little of it here from those claiming this is some false flag.
Logic and common sense tells me that the name Sandy Hook has been used in movies, novels and TV for decades, because the place actually exists and was
once a well known tourist attraction. Logic tells me that hundreds of people in that town would need to be "in on it" for any of these conspiracy
ideas to be even remotely plausible. Common sense tells me that if a government wanted to take all your guns, there would be easier ways to do it than
through murdering 27 people in front of the media.
edit on 20-12-2012 by detachedindividual because: (no reason given)