A lot of you can post countless theories about why it was a conspiracy . So its time one is posted that fully says it wasn't. But before you go on the
attack, actually read it all. You may learn something about the motive of this thread. And I wouldn't want someone looking foolish yelling at me for
something I might have said differently in the post.
The connection between Peter Lanza and Robert Holmes
This argument is most important due to motive and is purely false. A rumor spread across the internet by other conspiracy theorists to other
conspiracy theorists. Fact is Robert Holmes has never been scheduled to to testify for any Libor scandal. Nor is there any connection between FICO
and Libor. Lanza works as VP of taxes for GE's financial services. GE has never been connected with this investigation. Lanza has never appeared on
any witness list regarding Libor and FICO. There goes that whole motive thing. As mentioned in this thread:
The Batman map:
This is a map in The Dark Knight Rises. It shows Sandy Hook on a map that was seen for ,what, three seconds? This seems to be one of the more
prevalent arguments. So what? It is a prop in a movie two years before the shooting even happened. Unless you have worked on a movie set you have no
idea what you are talking about. I have. Everything is meticulous. So you would then have to imply Chirstopher Nolan in this conspiracy. Has there
been such a connection made? None.
The laughing dad:
I admit this one got me for a second until my logic stepped in. The father is seen laughing before he reads a speech prepared about his daughter.
Again, so what? Everyone reacts differently. Ive been around death and I have seen laughter, tears, sobs, screams. Everyone is different. How do you
know someone didn't just tell him a joke to ease his nerves before speaking in front of millions of people for the first time? Furthermore, I would
think that these evil powers that be would have gotten a better actor to play the part. Or do tptb just like leaving clues for all you ct'ers out
The misreporting by the media:
We live in a world where the media reported the wrong state in the presidential race and you expect them to get anything right? They all have their
own 'sources'. The police didn't know everything so how could the media? If this were a conspiracy, wouldn't the media have a nice tidy script to read
from? Or is this more fun from them giving the elite ct'ers out there clues to catch them? So Nancy Lanza was reported as a teacher, then a
substitute, then never working there. Ok, they got something wrong. Again, not the first time, nor the last time.
The second shooter:
This one is easy. The same media you vilify reported a possible second shooter. So are they telling the truth? Ok, I'll accept that there might have
been. Last time I heard the police were still investigating that lead. If there was a second shooter, then further discussion is needed. But you cant
just pick and chose which parts of the medias story to believe. Either they are lying, or not. Are they covering it up? Then why report it in the
first place and give you all something to talk about? More clues from that super secret powers that be having fun huh? And of course, then the local
police of Newtown are in the cover up as well. Those awful peace keepers and residents of the town, they knew victims families but are now sucked up
by tptb and are in on it as well?
Obama's fake tears:
This one had me laughing. So because Alex Jones puts out a viral video means yep, definitely faking tears. How do you not know he just successfully
held them back? How do you know he wasn't crying with his wife the entire time watching things unfold? You don't. You assume because there wasn't a
tear on his cheek. Ive begun to tear up before and successfully held them back. You'd never know I was crying.
So what are we left with.
Well if its a cover up, those involved include:
Christopher Nolan and co ( 4-5 people due to art directors prop masters, etc)
The Newtown police( rough guestimate, 50 or so police officers for this tiny town, could be very wrong)
The parents of the victims (so 40-50 people)
Barack Obama and co.( 10-20 people)
The media. Keeping it compartmentalized roughly 5 people form each network (45 or so people)
Just the basics to cover it up. I kept the numbers low. Were at around 155/160 people to cover this up. And this doesn't even involve the theories
that say everything was hoaxed including the victims. Then were looking at about 250 people at least.
Now I will not be like most of the CT threads and say "if you don't believe it get the heck out!!" I welcome new information on the subject.
Perhaps there is a smoking gun out there. But as of today, it has not been found.
And a few for the records: I am not a pure skeptic. Check out my posting history, there are a lot of topics I fully believe are a conspiracy. I simply
feel they have more facts behind them. So please save the 'leave ATS, this is a conspiracy site moron' lines. I also do not believe everything the
MSM tells me. I research what they report. I investigate to the best of my abilities. Newsflash though, some of the things they report are
true. Not every little thing they say is a lie and not every single event on the planet is a conspiracy. And Newtown is one of those events, that as
it stands now, is not a conspiracy.
But I'm ready to listen otherwise.
edit on 19-12-2012 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)