It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thinkpositive
When everything we read and try to piece together doesn't give us the answer; the next logical thing to do is see what the psychics have to say....(This really makes sense IMO).
Originally posted by harryhaller
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
This is the kind of damage patterns one would see with 3 round bursts or automatic fire - faces so mangled as to be unrecognizable. This is the kind of ugly evidence that proves something happened at that school differently than from what we've been told.
Dude, i've used .223 and uzi 9mm fully auto. No such thing as either "3 round bursts" or "groupings" for anyone other than a well built highly trained expert. Even at 5-10m with a rifle or handgun a grouping is an achievement, with adrenaline flowing many shots would miss. Unless you're a highly trained expert firearms user.
One of the few certainties we have was that Adam was a scrawny kid, recoil is not for sissies.
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by thinkpositive
When everything we read and try to piece together doesn't give us the answer; the next logical thing to do is see what the psychics have to say....(This really makes sense IMO).
As long as we're giving opinions, here's mine.
The above statement is perhaps one of the dumbest thoughts I've seen expressed here.
3:15PM UPDATE: WASHINGTON (AP) - A law enforcement official says the suspect in the Connecticut school shootings is 24-year-old Ryan Lanza and that his younger brother is being held for questioning as a possible second shooter. The law enforcement official says the boys' mother, Nancy Lanza, works at the school as a teacher.
The official also said Ryan Lanza's girlfriend and another friend are missing in New Jersey.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the official said the suspect is dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the source was not authorized to speak on the record about the developing criminal investigation.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
I'm adding this for the segment at the end covering Eugene Rosen showing that his story bears closer scrutiny.
Also, starting around the 11:00 minute mark there's a good analysis of the police radio transmissions - worth a watch.
there's a bunch of movie-plot stuff then the "parents aren't grieving enough" nonsense so no need to repeat that experience however the radio transcription and the bit at the end make it worth posting.edit on 29-12-2012 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sconner755
Please explain to us specifically the part of Gene Rosen's story that you're having trouble matching to your view of how he should have acted? Or do you think he made up the entire story about the kids at his house?
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
There was a manhunt following this incident and I have reason to believe there still is. I know one thing for sure.....there are some court dates in the next few weeks for one certain person who I will not name. If he fails to show that will speak volumes.
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
)
Originally posted by Sek82
I'd like to see what the physics have to say.
Show me the broken window/damage outside the school, or evidence anyone even bled that day... There is none to be seen.
What is more suspicious about that photo of the rear of the car? The fact it contains a different license plate number than the front, or that it was taken from such an obviously sneaky position in the treeline?
Hmm... this still looks like a drill to me, that, or incredibly inept law enforcement.
Originally posted by sconner755
Nice touch. Pointing people to the 11:00 minute mark to watch a bunch of young women get slaughtered. The radio "analysis" if you can call it that doesn't start until 11:39.
Originally posted by sconner755
An hour long video of Sandy Hook footage interspersed with a lame movie about a school shooting, and then disparaging Gene Rosen AGAIN?
Originally posted by sconner755
Here's the common pattern in all your analysis. You have very few facts about Sandy Hook. You see things that in one person's tiny limited world view (yours) don't make sense too you. You then draw conclusions based entirely on opinion, not facts.
Originally posted by sconner755
We get it. You entertain fantasies of some malevolent conspiracy to murder school kids. You're willing to bring into question the integrity and motivation of Gene Rosen, who by all accounts just seems to be a guy unlucky enough to live next to the school.
Originally posted by sconner755
I'm surprised SO or a mod hasn't pulled the plug on this thread since you're calling out Gene Rosen by name AGAIN. Many think defaming, without an iota of evidence, Gene Rosen is bottom of the barrel, sensationalistic, human behavior and lacks any decency. Actually that describes the video you posted as well.
Originally posted by sconner755
Please explain to us specifically the part of Gene Rosen's story that you're having trouble matching to your view of how he should have acted? Or do you think he made up the entire story about the kids at his house?
Originally posted by harryhaller
It stinks, so does your defense of a seriously creepy guy.
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
reply to post by SMOKINGGUN2012
Well I certainly would not recommend "fast forwarding" to :50 seconds as the info is relevent to consider.
So apparently, there is no way of knowing or proving without video evidence which windows were broken by an alleged shooter and which were done by police forcing themselves in from several vantage points.
When I arrived at :50, I can tell you that if that is what they are saying he came through, I find that a really bad photo to make that point. What? Are we to believe he shinnied through that broken glass elevated hole?
How? Given that most all glass doors at school are wire embedded.edit on 30-12-2012 by PaperbackWriter because: (no reason given)