Once again I have something to share that I feel will be appreciated by those that seek to know, something about what we are not being told.
While I myself have also already done the logistical ammunition count, 30 rd magazine comparison and considered the weight factor, I have concluded
much like this OP that there are inconsistencies in the official story.
Well, before we go counting bullets and noting all of the many flaws in the official story, consider the following two items of discussion.
I have two items to share are both related to one another and for the sake of brevity, the first item is that on the day of the shooting incident on
the recorded 911 dispatch tape of the shooting incident there is a portion where multiple shadows or people are reported and then there is a segment
where there is a cop talking to dispatch while cops are chasing 3 men.
On the 911 dispatch tape you can clearly hear him state, "they're coming at me...then two distinct pop...pop sounds that to me are clearly gun
The 911 dispatch tape recorded what I feel is a cop discharging his weapon twice. It is at this point of the shooting that the 3rd man being chased
is then seen on video running into the woods where he is eventually captured and handcuffed.
911 dispatch tape with cop stating they're coming at me...pop..pop
Item two is that in a new video that shows CT Vance reporting about the two new wounded survivors days after the shooting. He states they suffered
gun shot wounds and when asked details of the matter, Vance states that he cannot discuss it, because they are both witnesses.
New wounded identified as adults "witnesses" by CT Vance.
Now the reasons these two videos and their information are important, is because the men CT Vance is referring to as being shot survivors, are I
believe the two men that the cop shot during the 911 call on day one that was recorded on the 911 dispatch tape for all to hear.
Since they are not under arrest and are named by CT Vance as witnesses, it ignores the question of who shot them, when it appears that Adam Lanza had
nothing to do with shooting them, since Adam Lanza was dead inside the school.
This incident on day one with the 3 men running and the one man who eventually runs into the woods are the same two men that the cop shot and since CT
Vance has omitted any discussion of who shot them, I can assume he is not going to acknowledge that these two new wounded supposed survivors were in
fact shot by law enforcement and not Adam Lanza.
In the 911 dispatch tape, moments after the cop can be heard discharging his weapon twice, we hear a request to dispatcher for two medical
This is the information that CT Vance has not discussed and to declare that these two new wounded men are witnesses that cannot be identified because
of the ongoing investigation, this is where we should ask why? And moreover, why was the 3rd man that ran into the woods who was part of the three
men running, why was he released if his two running mates who were shot and then declared witnesses?
This omission of fact needs to be discussed, but to discuss it you must first understand it. Listen to both videos for a quick inform, but if you
listen to the actual 911 tape you will see that the two new wounded men that Vance reported on are to me the two men that were shot by that cop on the
911 tape that was recorded for all to hear and where later two medical ambulances are called for of course, the two shot and wounded men.
It is time to ask hard questions and we should not allow for stonewalling to become the typical answer to our real questions that we need to discern
the truth of what happened and why it appears Law enforcement is so eager to deceive the public with omission of information needed to understand how
two men got shot, when Adam Lanza did not shoot them and the 911 tapes proves that a cop shot two men and then requested two medical ambulances for
It is time to end the charade and the lying. Not telling us the truth is not a matter of importance it seems, at least to me it appears as if we
don't know anything of the real truth and when we ask why things are as they are, it is as if we don't need to know the truth. CT Vance should be
made to explain how these two new wounded men got wounded and since they were not shot by Lanza, then his statement to the public that they are
witnesses comes into question and so does the credibility of CT Vance.
Thanks for the thread.