Originally posted by Asktheanimals
thanks for making my point. What you said is exactly what one teacher said she heard: pop, pop, pop, ...pop, pop, pop, - that's shots in groups of
3's - something you'll get from a select fire (full auto) AR15.
Not sure how that makes your point.
bang bang bang... bang bang bang... bang bang bang bang...
A person firing a semi-automatic can easily get off 30 shots in 10 seconds.
Even the coroner has trouble believing Lanza did the shooting:
“He must have been a good shot,” said Carver. “These are devastating sets of injuries
Lanza was not an experienced shooter at all - provided he even knew how to shoot.
No definitive evidence has been brought forth to substantiate such a claim.
The evidence points to a weapon being used that the police are not telling us about.
That is the definition of conspiracy.
Not that the event was faked in any way but that they would lie about the type of gun used to fit a political agenda (semi-auto rifles)
An flippant comment by the coroner is a very, very, very weak argument.
Small children huddled together in a classroom would not require Lanza to be a good shot.
Here's an anecdotal example.
I take my kids to amusement parks and fairs where you can try to shoot out a red star on a target with a automatic bb gun. When my kids were under
10, the first time they tried it, they had no problem hitting the red star on the target.
We're not talking a sniper shooting somebody from 300 yards. We're talking about a semi-automatic rifle aiming a large targets from less than 20
feet. He could be a bad shot and miss the kid he was aiming at and hit another kid beside his target.
Another anecdotal example.
At the same fairs and amusement parks there are dart games where you try to hit balloons with darts. Many times I aimed for a balloon and was so far
off I hit the balloon beside it, below it, above it, etc.
Seriously, get some perspective. This is coming across as desperation to find a conspiracy where there is none, especially since no official reports
have been released.
It is far less likely that a second shooter got away, and the police decided to cover it up.
Did you think through everything that would need to be true for that to have happened?
2nd shooter. No witnesses to contradict lone shooter. Police tipped off ahead of time and allowed the massacre to happen.
We can stop there.
There is no credible reason to believe that the local police would have been involved in a conspiracy to allow 20 kids to be killed at their local