It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bjax9er
The right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
What part of that do you commies not understand?
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Think of what you are saying. Logically, if that was true, then the first amendment would only apply to quill pens, voice, and manual printing presses and would not apply to TV, radio, internet, e-books, computers, telegraph, and telephone.
We have to interpret how it would apply, as the founding fathers had no knowledge of mass media.
My point is, you can't take what the founding fathers said literally, because our world and everything in it has changed so much. It requires interpretation. And we can interpret that some weapons are just too dangerous to be in the hands of the public, because they cause more harm than good.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
We have to interpret how it would apply, as the founding fathers had no knowledge of mass media.
My point is, you can't take what the founding fathers said literally, because our world and everything in it has changed so much. It requires interpretation. And we can interpret that some weapons are just too dangerous to be in the hands of the public, because they cause more harm than good.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
How can I be against it?
Simple - it's infringing on my God given rights.
Those who want a New Constitution are welcome to secede and try a new Confederacy.
You can't prove God exists, let alone gave you any rights.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
How can I be against it?
Simple - it's infringing on my God given rights.
Those who want a New Constitution are welcome to secede and try a new Confederacy.
You can't prove God exists, let alone gave you any rights.
My AK is what gives me the power to say that I can believe in both.
Can you prove my AK is wrong?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
How can I be against it?
Simple - it's infringing on my God given rights.
Those who want a New Constitution are welcome to secede and try a new Confederacy.
You can't prove God exists, let alone gave you any rights.
My AK is what gives me the power to say that I can believe in both.
Can you prove my AK is wrong?
Your posts are truly depressing. If there is a deity do you really think he/she/it would be more concerned about your right to an AK or childrens right to life ?
He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by Alfie1
I have 4 children and 2 grandchildren whose rights I fully intend to preserve.
Gun rights have nothing to do with the deaths of these children and I find using their deaths in such a blatantly politically way nothing short of disgusting.
Without gun rights we would have never been preserved as a free Republic.
How many dead people did it take to create that?
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
My AK is what gives me the power to say that I can believe in both.
Can you prove my AK is wrong?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by NavyDoc
You made absolutely no sense.
Only republicans supported voter ID.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by Alfie1
I have 4 children and 2 grandchildren whose rights I fully intend to preserve.
Gun rights have nothing to do with the deaths of these children and I find using their deaths in such a blatantly politically way nothing short of disgusting.
Without gun rights we would have never been preserved as a free Republic.
How many dead people did it take to create that?
Of course so-called "gun rights " had everything to do with it. With so many on here it is like talking to an alcoholic who just keeps insisting he is a social drinker.
What on earth was a middle-aged mother doing with an armoury in her home which enabled her nutty son to go off on this spree with multiple weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition ? Is that normal ?