Originally posted by CinnamonHearts
reply to post by fiftyfifty
You put an awful lot of faith in the "investigators" and MSM if you really think we're ever going to get the true facts of what happened that day.
The supposed shooter is dead, and they still refuse to give even a basic timeline of what happened that morning, for example from the first 911 call
to arrival of the police to removal of the last student/staff. That tells me they're hiding something.
If you're waiting for the truth from an investigation, you'll be waiting a long time.
edit on 19-12-2012 by CinnamonHearts because: (no
I'm not saying THIS incident is another "engineered event" -- but I do wonder out loud if; the new "tactic" is to NOT go for a complex to pull
off event like 9/11, and do something that's MUCH easier to control, but just as emotionally effective.
Grab someone; either a loner or some kid with mental history, give them whatever course of drugs turns off their emotions and makes them follow
suggestions (yes, you definitely can turn someone into a killer with todays drugs -- stop pretending good wishes conquers all). Then the subject is
somehow given a series of "trigger images" -- you know; "attack this when you see it". They are placed at the scene, and maybe a few handlers or
on hand to make sure carnage ensues, and anyone with a clear understanding of the situation is part of the death toll.
The Batman attack had tear gas. The "culprit" claimed to have no knowledge of events a few days later. That could be an excuse but why would someone
so crazy to do such a thing -- deny it? Does anyone plan to go into a theater and kill everyone and then get off on a technicality?
The media is totally bankrupt now of journalistic integrity. The reporters know with keen instinct what subjects to avoid and to follow the primrose
path of "The Story" that they are supposed to tell. We saw the tone set on 9/11; at one point, we heard that the attackers had attended a strip club
in Florida, and people were investigating the small airport and the ringleaders girl friend -- SUDDENLY, the story was "these were devout Muslims"
and the media dutifully went after the "they hate us for our freedoms" line and the story became about extremists.
It's pretty easy to get into a Kindergarten or a Movie theater and CONTROL THE EVENT, then give the Media the leads you want, and once the "story"
is running, they only report things that fit the story.
>> If I were an evil billionaire wanting to manipulate this country -- tagging a few troubled people and drugging them to create a massacre would
definitely be "a lot easier" to control. I'm just still waiting to see the motive on this.
However, that Benghazi attack that embarrassed the White House was right on the heels of Obama giving the cold shoulder to delegates of Israeli's
government over the Iran war they wants us to start for them... in that case, there WAS much more of a potential link. Anyway -- I scolded others
about moving towards motive and accusations before we had evidence, and here I am wandering that way.
The only point I'm making is that; for whatever reason -- attacking America at it's weak points and manipulating our emotions is a lot easier with a
manipulated patsy than flying airplanes into buildings. It's a lot cheaper too.